2010
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Linaclotide for Patients With Chronic Constipation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
1
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
125
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Despite the different impact on colorectal sensatory mechanisms, 19,[21][22][23] linaclotide, lubiprostone and tegaserod similarly alleviated chronic pain ratings in IBS-C and constipation. [9][10][11][24][25][26] The relationship between improved bowel patterns and decreased discomfort, as highlighted by our meta-analysis, does not establish an underlying mechanism, but fits into a larger context of past experimental and clinical data. As mentioned above, loperamide reduced bowel frequency in healthy volunteers to a degree sufficient to trigger symptoms consistent with IBS-C. 29 While few comparative effectiveness analyses of active agents are available, the limited evidence does not support superiority of more recently developed agents with polyethylene glycol (PEG) being either superior or equivalent to tegaserod.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…22 Despite the different impact on colorectal sensatory mechanisms, 19,[21][22][23] linaclotide, lubiprostone and tegaserod similarly alleviated chronic pain ratings in IBS-C and constipation. [9][10][11][24][25][26] The relationship between improved bowel patterns and decreased discomfort, as highlighted by our meta-analysis, does not establish an underlying mechanism, but fits into a larger context of past experimental and clinical data. As mentioned above, loperamide reduced bowel frequency in healthy volunteers to a degree sufficient to trigger symptoms consistent with IBS-C. 29 While few comparative effectiveness analyses of active agents are available, the limited evidence does not support superiority of more recently developed agents with polyethylene glycol (PEG) being either superior or equivalent to tegaserod.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Considering the defining role of pain and discomfort in IBS-C, a paradigm is evolving, which first examines efficacy in patients with chronic constipation, followed by trials in patients with IBS-C, which require more comprehensive assessments that demonstrate improvement beyond changes in bowel patterns. [9][10][11][12][13] The results of the newer studies demonstrated lower pain ratings during treatment and prompted speculations about specific analgesic effects of these agents, potentially differentiating them from more conventional laxatives, a feature that has been particularly highlighted in reviews and advertising campaigns. 14,15 Based largely on their impact on abdominal pain, the recently introduced pro-secretory agents (lubiprostone and linaclotide) were approved in the United States not only for the treatment of chronic constipation, but also specifically for the management of IBS-C, with marketing campaigns emphasizing their presumably unique benefits related to pain relief.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Linaclotide, a non-absorbed substance approved for the treatment of constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C), acts by binding to this specific receptor. An intracellular cascade of events leads to activation of chloride secretion and thereby a net movement of water into the gut lumen, resulting in softer stool and more frequent bowel movements [27]. A feature of particular interest relates to reductions in constipation associated abdominal pain [28] and bloating [29], which can develop gradually over months from the start of treatment.…”
Section: Constipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the previous study, a phase IIb multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 310 patients with CIC [Lembo et al 2010]. The study was conducted at 57 clinical centres in the USA.…”
Section: Phase Iib Studymentioning
confidence: 99%