2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11748-016-0688-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of limited proximal arch replacement for type A acute aortic dissection with critical complications

Abstract: Limited proximal arch repair is suitable for high-risk patients with AAD, despite no excision of the intimal tear.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the high complication rates and perioperative mortality of extended aortic arch repair, many surgeons are reluctant to perform a simple proximal repair alone, especially for acute type A AD with critical complications. 17 In the past, proximal permutation has been used extensively for type A AD, 5 In recent years, enlargement surgery has been used more frequently to completely eliminate lacerations. The meta-analysis suggested that the two methods had survival rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the high complication rates and perioperative mortality of extended aortic arch repair, many surgeons are reluctant to perform a simple proximal repair alone, especially for acute type A AD with critical complications. 17 In the past, proximal permutation has been used extensively for type A AD, 5 In recent years, enlargement surgery has been used more frequently to completely eliminate lacerations. The meta-analysis suggested that the two methods had survival rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the high complication rates and perioperative mortality of extended aortic arch repair, many surgeons are reluctant to perform a simple proximal repair alone, especially for acute type A AD with critical complications. 17 In the past, proximal permutation has been used extensively for type A AD, 5 In recent years, enlarge- survival rate. 7,18 Therefore, we believe that extensive surgery could improve distal vascular remodeling, reduce the reoperation rate significantly, and create conditions for TEVAR and thoracoabdominal aorta replacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many surgeons are inclined to use only simple proximal repair, considering the high perioperative mortality and complication rates of extended arch repair. 14 A metaanalysis showed that although conservative proximal repair decreased early postoperative mortality, the reoperation rate on the distal vessels significantly increased, and the longterm survival rate was not improved. 15 Total arch replacement and FET could significantly improve distal vascular remodeling, decrease the reoperation rate, and create conditions for thoracoabdominal aorta replacement and thoracic endovascular aortic repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%