Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy in the management of menorrhagia: 400 consecutive cases

Abstract

Study objective To assess the safety and patient satisfaction of laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) using a standardised surgical technique.Design Prospective observational study.Setting Princess Royal University Hospital, Chelsfield Park Hospital and Sloane Hospital, Kent, UK.Patients and materials Four hundred consecutive women with menorrhagia underwent LSH. The procedure was performed using the Plasma Kinetic Bipolar Diathermy (Gyrus International Ltd, Berkshire, UK) for pedicle ligation and the Lap Loop system (Roberts Surgical Healthcare Ltd, Kidderminster, UK) to detach the cervix. An electromechanical morcellator (Morcellex; Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Cincinnati, OH, USA) was used to remove the uterus from the abdominal cavity.Main outcome measures Patient satisfaction, morbidity rates and readmission rates.Results A total of 400 LSH were performed between February 2003 and November 2006. The principal clinical indication for hysterectomy was menorrhagia. The mean duration of surgery was 46.4 minutes. The mean operative blood loss was 126 ml. Concurrent surgery was performed in 141 women. Minor and major perioperative complications were encountered in 5% (n = 20) of women. The major complication rate was 1.2% (n = 5): three women (0.75%) with bladder perforation, two women (0.5%) with bowel injury and one woman (0.25%) with a vesicocervical fistula. Eight women (2%) suffered from cyclical vaginal bleeding postoperatively.Conclusions LSH is a safe and effective treatment for menorrhagia and other menstrual disorders when hysterectomy is indicated. Women appreciate the quick recovery period, reduced time off work and faster return to normal activity. Our data suggest that LSH can replace abdominal hysterectomy in selected cases.

Vaginal Cuff Closure: A Comparison between the Vaginal Route and Laparoscopic Suture in Patients Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

“…Previous studies have indicated that there are major complications such as urinary tract injury and great vessel injury, which can be minimized with training, experience, and use of meticulous surgical techniques. LH is generally considered safe and effective [3,9,10]. However, there are a few reports on vaginal cuff-related problems such as disruption, dehiscence, vaginal vault bleeding, granulation, cuff infection, vaginal spotting, and vault prolapse.…”

A new approach to supracervical hysterectomy during laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: A randomized clinical trial

“…These devices facilitate and increase the safety of this procedure. 11,12 However, the available laparoscopic morcellators may be difficult to use (weight, ergonomics, etc.) and they could be associated to potentially serious complications such as visceral injuries.…”

Pain reduction after total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy among women with dysmenorrhoea: a randomised controlled trial

“…The majority of hysterectomies incorporate removal of the cervix, but the rate of supracervical (or subtotal) hysterectomy has increased in the last decades . Supracervical hysterectomy is mainly performed in premenopausal women with benign conditions and no previous history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).…”