2015
DOI: 10.5958/0974-8172.2015.00069.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of ipm modules against mango hopper complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the pest population reduction efficiency of the modules was compared, resulting in the PRMM-II reducing the pest population up to 90.79 %, followed by PRMM-I, with 83.61 %. Similarly, PRMM-III reduced the pest population up to 75.78 %, while 72.18 % was reduced by PRMM-IV, as already reported by Bana et al (2015). In their study, Bana et al (2015) formulated five modules to mitigate the population of mango hopper in mango orchards.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the pest population reduction efficiency of the modules was compared, resulting in the PRMM-II reducing the pest population up to 90.79 %, followed by PRMM-I, with 83.61 %. Similarly, PRMM-III reduced the pest population up to 75.78 %, while 72.18 % was reduced by PRMM-IV, as already reported by Bana et al (2015). In their study, Bana et al (2015) formulated five modules to mitigate the population of mango hopper in mango orchards.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Similarly, PRMM-III reduced the pest population up to 75.78 %, while 72.18 % was reduced by PRMM-IV, as already reported by Bana et al (2015). In their study, Bana et al (2015) formulated five modules to mitigate the population of mango hopper in mango orchards. The module-V in their study considered integrated pest management based on insecticides and botanicals application.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…India has 188 species of which 188 have been documented [4]. Hoppers species such as Amritodus atkinsoni Lethierry, Idioscopus clypealis Lethierry, and Idioscopus nitidulus Walker stay active and inflict up to 100% losses in mango crops from the emergence of new flush through flowering cum fruit setting stages [5,6]. Both nymph and adult hoppers have been seen sucking cell sap from young leaves, fragile shoots, inflorescences or panicles, and the rachis of young fruits, preventing flowers from blooming and immature fruits from falling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the study period peak periods were recorded mango hopper highly associate with month Feb.-July, thrips, ash grey beetle andmidge highly recorded at month Feb.-April, shoot borer highly associated with month Feb.-Sept., peak period in fruit flies May-July, leaf webber highly recorded in month Jan.-Feb. & Oct.-Dec., leaf miner in March., stem borer in month Jan.-Dec., scale insects were highly recorded in month March-April & Oct.-Dec., giant mealy bug in month June-July & Dec., mites/spider March-April, red ants Jan.-July, Bark eating caterpillar Jan.-April & Sep.-Nov., fruit borers were highly recorded in month April-July, termites highly recorded in month Jan. & Sep.-Dec., shoot gall psylla Feb.-May, mango seed weevil or mango nut weevil or mango stone weevil Mar.-June, lady bird beetle April, parasitoids (Chrysocharis pentheus) April-May, green bottle fly Mar.-May, damsel fly April-May, respectively. Thrips have also been identified as a significant pest and yield limiting factor in south Gujarat and elsewhere[5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%