2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-1026-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of intraoperatively prepared cell-based constructs for bone regeneration

Abstract: BackgroundConventional cell-based bone regeneration suffers from the major disadvantage of limited cell supply, time-consuming in vitro expansion cultures, and limited patient-friendliness related to cell isolation and multiple visits to the clinic. Here, we utilized an alternative concept using “easy access cells” that can be obtained in an intraoperative manner to prepare cell-based constructs.MethodsWe used stromal vascular fraction (SVF) from human adipose tissue and human monocytes for intraoperative prep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a study conducted on the ADSC stored for longer than 10 years has reported that long-term cryopreservation maintains cell viability with certain negative effects on osteogenic potential of ADSCs [61], for better clarity on SVF, comparison between different cryopreservation periods using the same animal model is ideal and should be considered. Several recent studies have reported the therapeutic potential of cryopreserved SVF has for bone healing in equine fracture [33] and rat bone defect models [34]. However, to the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to compare the therapeutic benefits of fracture healing using the same animal unhealing fracture model between freshly isolated and cryopreserved SVFs, and strengthen the evidence of usefulness of cryopreservation of SVFs to efficiently maintain angiogenic and osteogenic potentials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a study conducted on the ADSC stored for longer than 10 years has reported that long-term cryopreservation maintains cell viability with certain negative effects on osteogenic potential of ADSCs [61], for better clarity on SVF, comparison between different cryopreservation periods using the same animal model is ideal and should be considered. Several recent studies have reported the therapeutic potential of cryopreserved SVF has for bone healing in equine fracture [33] and rat bone defect models [34]. However, to the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to compare the therapeutic benefits of fracture healing using the same animal unhealing fracture model between freshly isolated and cryopreserved SVFs, and strengthen the evidence of usefulness of cryopreservation of SVFs to efficiently maintain angiogenic and osteogenic potentials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Cryopreservation is an appropriate solution since SVF cells can be easily frozen and stored, while maintaining the proliferative capacity and differentiation potential [31]. Recent studies have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of rat SVF for bone fracture in 8 human patients [32]; while cryopreserved SVF cells have been shown to facilitate bone healing in an equine carpal chip fracture [33] and rat bone defect model [34]. However, no study has compared the therapeutic benefits of fracture healing using the same animal model between freshly isolated and cryopreserved SVFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this frame, in previous reports, bone marrow MSCs promoted changes in the M1/M2 balance in vitro [99]. This paradigm may also explain the in vitro observation that both ASCs and SVF induced macrophage polarization toward a pro-wound healing M2 type [100]. Therefore, thanks to secreted factors, ASCs in enriched tissues as MFAT or SVF can attenuate M1 macrophages by shifting them to an M2 state, laying the foundations for injury resolution in inflammatory-stimulating environments, such as OA joints.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…After fixation, tibia samples from each group were decalcified in an EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) solution, dehydrated in a series of alcohol, and embedded in paraffin, as reported previously [ 24 ]. The specimens were sectioned at a thickness of 5 ​μm using a standard microtome (RM 2165; Leica).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%