2020
DOI: 10.3233/bmr-170906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of intensive, hospital-based rehabilitation in cases of thoracic outlet syndrome that failed to respond to private-practice physiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by Lindgren [17] and Thevenon and al [14] but not by Nael [15]. However, methodological differences mean that it is di cult to compare studies in the workplace: the time since symptom onset and the occupational classi cations differed from one study to another.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…by Lindgren [17] and Thevenon and al [14] but not by Nael [15]. However, methodological differences mean that it is di cult to compare studies in the workplace: the time since symptom onset and the occupational classi cations differed from one study to another.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies of work-related problems associated with TOS were retrospective or cohort-based and have not provided enough evidence of a causal etiological role of occupational factors; hence, TOS is not recognized (in France, at least) as an occupational illness [9,12,13]. Furthermore, a number of studies have assessed di culties at work caused by the TOS (with a focus on occupational incapacity and the amount of time off work) but did not analyze more precisely the nature and degree of inconvenience caused [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%