2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of home-based non-pharmacological interventions for treating depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Abstract: ObjectivesTo systematically review and compare the efficacy of all available home-based non-pharmacological treatments of depression.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Data sourcesMedline, Scopus and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were searched since inceptions to 7 August 2016.Eligibility criteriaRandomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of home-based non-pharmacological interventions with usual care of patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 43 ] Exercise interventions can reach high magnitude of treatment effect to depressive symptoms of depressed college students, the SMD of exercise treatments vs usual care was -1.13. A previous meta-analysis by Sukhato et al [ 44 ] has concluded that the SMD of exercise intervention versus usual care was −0.73, which is less than our result. They mainly focused on depression in adults, which was different from the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…[ 43 ] Exercise interventions can reach high magnitude of treatment effect to depressive symptoms of depressed college students, the SMD of exercise treatments vs usual care was -1.13. A previous meta-analysis by Sukhato et al [ 44 ] has concluded that the SMD of exercise intervention versus usual care was −0.73, which is less than our result. They mainly focused on depression in adults, which was different from the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Exercise interventions can reach high magnitude of treatment effect to depressive symptoms of depressed college students, the SMD of exercise treatments versus usual care was -1.13. A previous meta-analysis by Sukhato etal [42] has concluded that the SMD of exercise intervention versus usual care was -0.73, which is less than our result. They mainly focused on depression in adults, which was different from the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, meta-analyses and systematic reviews support the notion that “exercise as medicine” ( Pedersen and Saltin, 2015 ; Gerber et al, 2016 ; Hallgren et al, 2016 ) also benefits patients with mental disorders such as major depressive disorders ( Knapen et al, 2015 ; Stubbs et al, 2016 ; Bailey et al, 2017 ; Krogh et al, 2017 ; Schuch et al, 2017 ; Sukhato et al, 2017 ; Vancampfort et al, 2017a ; Wu et al, 2017 ), including among elderly patients ( Mikkelsen et al, 2017 ; Perez-Lopez et al, 2017 ), post-partum depression ( McCurdy et al, 2017 ; Poyatos-Leon et al, 2017 ; Pritchett et al, 2017 ; Saligheh et al, 2017 ), bipolar disorders ( Vancampfort et al, 2017a ), post-traumatic stress disorders ( Rosenbaum et al, 2015 ; Vancampfort et al, 2016 ), anxiety disorders ( Gordon et al, 2017 ; Stubbs et al, 2017 ; Vancampfort et al, 2017b , c , d ), and psychosis/schizophrenia ( Pajonk et al, 2010 ; Keller-Varady et al, 2017 ; Mittal et al, 2017 ; Tarpada and Morris, 2017 ; Vancampfort et al, 2017a ), while among patients with substance use disorders the evidence supporting regular exercise is weaker [alcohol use disorder: ( Vancampfort et al, 2015a ; Hallgren et al, 2017 ); tobacco use disorder: ( Ussher et al, 2014 )].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%