2013
DOI: 10.2478/bvip-2013-0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of hCG and GnRH with Respect to Follicular Size and Presence of the Corpus Luteum in Cosynch Protocol Integrated with Norgestomet in Lactating Cows

Abstract: Efficacies of hCG and GnRH with respect to follicular diameter in Cosynch protocol were investigated. Lactating cows (n=119) received injections of GnRH and PGF 2 7 d apart. Norgestomet ear implant was inserted at GnRH administration and removed prior to PGF 2 injections. Presence of the corpus luteum (CL) at GnRH and PGF 2 injections, and diameter of preovulatory follicle [small (SPF) <8 mm or large (LPF) ≥8 mm] at PGF 2 were determined with transrectal ultrasonography (USG). The animals were randomly treated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, CR in hCG based protocols was significantly (P<0.05) lower as compared to GnRH based treatments. Our results are in accordance with the findings of other workers (Keskin et al 2010, Pancarci et al 2013. Human chorionic gonadotropin has seen limited use in estrus synchronization protocols.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, CR in hCG based protocols was significantly (P<0.05) lower as compared to GnRH based treatments. Our results are in accordance with the findings of other workers (Keskin et al 2010, Pancarci et al 2013. Human chorionic gonadotropin has seen limited use in estrus synchronization protocols.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Geary et al (2001) also indicated a small reduction in CR when Cosynch is compared with Ovsynch, which is similar with our findings. In present study, 33.33% CR following hCG based modified Ovsynch treatment protocol (G3) was in concurrence with CR (28.10 and 37.60%) reported by Pancarci et al (2013) and Keskin et al (2010) respectively. In modified Co-synch protocol (G4), lower CR (16.67%) was recorded in our study as compared to 34% recorded by Geary et al (2001).…”
supporting
confidence: 79%