2007
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of gabapentin in the management of chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy

Abstract: This trial failed to demonstrate any benefit to using gabapentin to treat symptoms caused by CIPN.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
95
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The therapeutic action of Gabapentin on neuropathic pain is thought to involve voltage-gated calcium channels. Studies have failed to demonstrate the benefit of gabapentin in the treatment of CIPN-related symptoms [52, 77]. A related drug, pregabalin, is often used to treat adults with CIPNs.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The therapeutic action of Gabapentin on neuropathic pain is thought to involve voltage-gated calcium channels. Studies have failed to demonstrate the benefit of gabapentin in the treatment of CIPN-related symptoms [52, 77]. A related drug, pregabalin, is often used to treat adults with CIPNs.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 While some of these therapies provide modest improvements in neurological function, in most instances, these agents are associated with additional negative side effects for cancer patients, including cardiac conduction defects and increased chemotherapy resistance. [7][8][9] Thus, other interventions that address the symptoms of CIPN should be considered. One intervention that has the potential of preventing or alleviating CIPN is exercise rehabilitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies have tested a prophylactic approach to OXA‐induced neuropathy by administering drugs before chemotherapy was started [10], [11], [13], [14], [15], others have focused on patients already with OXAIPN [12], [16], [17] and already presenting with neuropathic symptoms [18], thus performing a formal treatment trial rather than a preemptive or prophylactic approach. The bulk of evidence is negative for both scenarios [12], [14], [19], [20], with rare exceptions [17], [21]. Importantly, the large majority of studies have not used validated pain measurement tools [10], [11], [13], [14], [16], [19], [22], [23], while most have used the common terminology criteria (CTC) adverse events grading system as the primary outcome measurement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this choice is sound and supported by robust evidence [24], it must be kept in mind that most patients with OXAIPN have small‐fiber‐predominant polyneuropathy [1], which has as its main symptom neuropathic pain. However, pain itself (i.e., visual analog scale (VAS), BPI) or neuropathic pain symptoms (i.e., NPSI) have rarely been used as a primary outcome in studies on OXAIPN, and only a few have used validated pain scales or questionnaires at all [12], [20], [21], [25]. Also, neuropathic symptoms have only rarely been evaluated [17], [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%