2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1797-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice

Abstract: Fulvestrant 500 mg administered in clinical practice was shown to be effective (PFS, 10.6 months; CBR, 56.5%) and well tolerated, in accordance with previous trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The available real-world experiences, although not fully comparable for population heterogeneity, treatment line, and clinical context, globally confirm that F500 is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for postmenopausal HR+/HER2− MBC. 3034 The most recently reported study described a CBR of 61% on 160 patients treated with F500 in different lines, with a PFS of 7 months and an OS of 35 months; as in our experience, visceral involvement had a prognostic value for PFS, whereas endocrine sensitivity and upfront metastatic disease negatively correlated with OS. As expected, patients who had received previous first-line ET for advanced disease exhibited a worse outcome and a lower CBR, while patients with lower body mass index had a PFS advantage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The available real-world experiences, although not fully comparable for population heterogeneity, treatment line, and clinical context, globally confirm that F500 is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for postmenopausal HR+/HER2− MBC. 3034 The most recently reported study described a CBR of 61% on 160 patients treated with F500 in different lines, with a PFS of 7 months and an OS of 35 months; as in our experience, visceral involvement had a prognostic value for PFS, whereas endocrine sensitivity and upfront metastatic disease negatively correlated with OS. As expected, patients who had received previous first-line ET for advanced disease exhibited a worse outcome and a lower CBR, while patients with lower body mass index had a PFS advantage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In the cohort of patients treated as 1st line in the MonaLEEsa-3 study mPFS in the Fulvestrant/placebo arm was 19 months, while in the control arms of 2nd/3rd line studies with CDK 4/6i and Fulvestrant, mPFS decreased to 9 and 4.6 months, respectively [15][16][17] . Similar data have been reported in patients treated with Fulvestrant in real-world series [18][19][20] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%