2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of favipiravir in adults with mild COVID-19: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Abstract: Objective To evaluate whether favipiravir reduces the time to viral clearance as documented by negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in mild COVID-19 cases compared to placebo. Methods In this randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, and placebo-controlled trial, adults with PCR confirmed mild COVID-19 were recruited in an outpatient setting at seven medical facilities across Saudi Arabia. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either favipiravir 1800 mg by mouth t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was also reported in a multicentric double-blind randomised controlled trial, where the median time to clinical recovery was seven days. 14 Similarly, in a phase III placebo-controlled RCT of Moderate COVID-19 patients who did not require oxygen, patients who received Favipiravir had a three-day shorter clinical cure, with a significant difference (p = 0.0136) and a hazard ratio of 1.59 (1.02–2.48). 15 In another metaanalysis 16 of 11 eligible studies, 5 of which included a comparison group, the Favipiravir group had significantly greater clinical improvement on days 7 and 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was also reported in a multicentric double-blind randomised controlled trial, where the median time to clinical recovery was seven days. 14 Similarly, in a phase III placebo-controlled RCT of Moderate COVID-19 patients who did not require oxygen, patients who received Favipiravir had a three-day shorter clinical cure, with a significant difference (p = 0.0136) and a hazard ratio of 1.59 (1.02–2.48). 15 In another metaanalysis 16 of 11 eligible studies, 5 of which included a comparison group, the Favipiravir group had significantly greater clinical improvement on days 7 and 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a number of medications were initially thought to be beneficial against COVID-19, such as favipiravir and hydroxychloroquine. However, studies have proven that these medications have no effect against COVID-19 25 . These developments represent additional reasons for the high cost of treating COVID-19 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a clinical trial conducted in Saudi Arabia, in which 231 COVID-19 patients (treatment group) were treated with favipiravir and a placebo group of 119 patients were kept in a similar environment, the median time for viral clearance was 10 days in the treatment group versus 8 days in the placebo group, and the median time for clinical recovery was 7 days in both groups. This trial suggests that favipiravir does not shorten the time required for viral clearance [ 32 ]. The available clinical trials indicate that favipiravir relieves cough and fever but fails to accelerate viral clearance [ 33 ].…”
Section: Current Antiviral Drugs For Covid-19 Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%