2014
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Exercise Intervention as Determined by the McKenzie System of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study is a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of exercise intervention as determined by the McKenzie System of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy in participants with knee OA (clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT01641874) 18 . Participants had a radiologically confirmed diagnosis of knee OA made by an orthopedic surgeon and had pain for at least 4 months.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study is a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of exercise intervention as determined by the McKenzie System of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy in participants with knee OA (clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT01641874) 18 . Participants had a radiologically confirmed diagnosis of knee OA made by an orthopedic surgeon and had pain for at least 4 months.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group in a 2:1 ratio since the intervention group was further divided into subgroups for the primary study 18 . The control group received the standard of care which included pain medication and continued follow-up with an orthopedic surgeon.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that an assessment to simply identify structures as the cause of pain does not elicit enough information to understand the problem or to justify a course of management (Jones and Rivett, 2004 It has also been suggested that classification systems like MDT, may offer better clinical utility as the categories of classification are based on patient's responses to repeated mechanical loading strategies rather than the presence of patho-anatomy (Lynch & May, 2013;May & Rosedale, 2012;Rosedale et al, 2014). An MDT assessment directs treatment with an appropriate loading strategy and in the presence of a directional preference, may determine who might and might not respond to treatment ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a pilot study, Kelly, May & Ross (2008) In a recent randomized control trial, Rosedale et al (2014) sought to examine the effectiveness of exercise intervention determined through an MDT on patients diagnosed with end stage knee OA. Not only were patients readily classified as Derangement or not Derangement, but it could be inferred that the large effect size of d = 0.77 to 0.87 for all primary outcomes seen at two weeks by the intervention group is attributable to the classification and exercise matching determined by the MDT assessment.…”
Section: Mckenzie System Of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited research on the use of McKenzie techniques on the knee. Rosedale conducted the first study of mechanical assessment and treatment using the McKenzie method on the knee joint [28]. However, muscle strength was not assessed in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%