2003
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2003.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of endoscopic and percutaneous treatments for biliary complications after cadaveric and living donor liver transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

6
121
1
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
121
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Retransplantation was needed in patients with hepatic artery thrombosis or after failure of multiple treatments. Our resolution rate of biliary complications by percutaneous and or endoscopic access was similar to other centers 21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Retransplantation was needed in patients with hepatic artery thrombosis or after failure of multiple treatments. Our resolution rate of biliary complications by percutaneous and or endoscopic access was similar to other centers 21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…[24][25][26][27] Post-transplant calculi and sludge formation are most likely the result of mechanical obstruction mainly strictures, bacterial infection, 6,24 ischemia, biliary reflux, and biliary mucosal inflammation. The ERCP with sphincterotomy is very successful in removing 90-100% of stones or debris in almost all cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ERCP with sphincterotomy is very successful in removing 90-100% of stones or debris in almost all cases. 6,16,24,25 Theories as to the etiology of biliary casts include sloughed biliary epithelium due to prolonged cold storage time or transient or ongoing ischemia, chronic rejection, infection, bile stasis, and alteration of the bile milieu. 16 Biliary cast syndrome describes the cholangiographic findings of multiple fixed filling defects in the intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary tree that conform to the luminal dimensions of the segment of BD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, no randomized controlled trial has compared the risk/benefit ratios of different endoscopic and percutaneous techniques. A previous study reported that success rate and patency were not different for endoscopic and percutaneous approaches, although percutaneous intervention showed a tendency to be associated with a greater immediate clinical improvement than the endoscopic method (7,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%