2015
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60891-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of early neonatal supplementation with vitamin A to reduce mortality in infancy in Haryana, India (Neovita): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
91
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
91
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings of a lack of significant benefit of neonatal VAS on survival at 6 months of age is at variance with other studies in south Asia 68. However, other studies in Africa have failed to show any benefits of neonatal VAS on survival 10 23 26.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings of a lack of significant benefit of neonatal VAS on survival at 6 months of age is at variance with other studies in south Asia 68. However, other studies in Africa have failed to show any benefits of neonatal VAS on survival 10 23 26.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Our study did not show any benefit on infant survival. Two of three large trials evaluating the impact of vitamin A on infant mortality have recently been published, demonstrating no benefits,10 26 although the study in India was associated with a 10% reduction in mortality at 6 months of age,8 once again lending support to the contention that the intervention may be relevant in populations with varying rates of maternal nutritional risks and vitamin A deficiency. Further recommendations on neonatal VAS must therefore await additional contextual analysis and targeting to populations at greatest risk, as well as comparison with alternative strategies 29 32…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These three studies were recently published and continue to show a difference in effects between South Asia and Africa. In India the newborn vitamin A supplementation showed a 6-month survival benefit (RR ¼ 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81À1.00), 61 whereas neither study in Africa showed an impact. 62,63 In the meta-analysis that was undertaken, a clear 6-month survival benefit in Asia was observed (RR ¼ 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78À0.96), whereas the pooled effect size in Africa was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.00À1.21).…”
Section: Newborn Vitamin a Supplementationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In Tanzania, RRR was 1.10 with 95% CI 0.95-1.26 and p-value 0.19 [16]. In India, RRR was 0.90 with 95% CI 0.81-1.0 and p-value 0.06 [32].…”
Section: Vitamin a Supplementation And Contradicting Viewpoints On Itmentioning
confidence: 94%