2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07583-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of digital single-operator cholangioscopy in the visual interpretation of indeterminate biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.97), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95), 9.29 (95% CI: 5.12-16.86), 0.08 (95% CI: 0.05-0.14) and 178.24 (95% CI: 80.10-396.64), respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9774 ( Figure S1). These findings are consistent with that of previous published articles [8], highlighting the diagnostic value of VI during DSOC.…”
Section: Meta-analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.97), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95), 9.29 (95% CI: 5.12-16.86), 0.08 (95% CI: 0.05-0.14) and 178.24 (95% CI: 80.10-396.64), respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9774 ( Figure S1). These findings are consistent with that of previous published articles [8], highlighting the diagnostic value of VI during DSOC.…”
Section: Meta-analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The present systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of DSOC-guided target biopsies. Previous studies have systematically explored the diagnostic value of VI during DSOC, but not biopsies [8]. The present study discussed the role of both VI and SB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In patients with prior negative or unconfirmed diagnosis after standard ERCP tissue acquisition, the overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of visual impression were 90-100%, 79-96%, and 89-97%(10) (Table 3). A meta-analysis including 283 patients by de Oliveira et al (11) demonstrated that visual impression to diagnose malignancy made by digital SOC had sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic Odds-ratio of 94%, 95%, 94%, 93%, 98%, and 309 respectively.…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overall sensitivity of 94% was reported for the visual diagnosis of malignant/neoplastic biliary strictures in a systematic review and a meta-analysis (10,11). A systematic review reported that four characteristics (tumor vessels, papillary projection, nodular or polypoid mass, and infiltrative lesions) were commonly used for detection of malignant/neoplastic biliary strictures at cholangioscopy (10).…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%