Efficacy of Different Types of Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Primary Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review

Noten, Suzie; Meeus, Mira; Stassijns, Gaëtane; Glabbeek, Francis Van; Verborgt, Olivier; Struyf, Filip

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.025

Cited by 66 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although there are no specific recommendations for shoulder dysfunction in the HNC population, recommendations for shoulder dysfunction from the general population may include an intraarticular corticosteroid injection for pain modulation, capsular distension under ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance, or 3-quadrant ultrasound to deep heat collagen structures. 54,55 For patients who completed HNC treatment relatively recently, sonographic heating of the shoulder should only be done with medical supervision because of the theoretical chance of tumor spread due to increased blood flow brought on by heating. For impairments like myofascial pain, trigger-point injections may be beneficial in reducing focal dystonia and pain.…”

Section: Screening For Spcs Seementioning

confidence: 99%

American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline

Cohen¹,

LaMonte

Erb

et al. 2016

CA A Cancer J Clinicians

465

470

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE The American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline was developed to assist primary care clinicians and other health practitioners with the care of head and neck cancer survivors, including monitoring for recurrence, screening for second primary cancers, assessment and management of long-term and late effects, health promotion, and care coordination. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed through April 2015, and a multidisciplinary expert workgroup with expertise in primary care, dentistry, surgical oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, clinical psychology, speech-language pathology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, the patient perspective, and nursing was assembled. While the guideline is based on a systematic review of the current literature, most evidence is not sufficient to warrant a strong recommendation. Therefore, recommendations should be viewed as consensus-based management strategies for assisting patients with physical and psychosocial effects of head and neck cancer and its treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:203-239. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

show abstract

Section: Screening For Spcs Seementioning

confidence: 99%

American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline

Cohen¹,

LaMonte

Erb

et al. 2016

CA A Cancer J Clinicians

465

470

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One reviewed 12 RCTs involving 810 patients. 41 This SR found that mobilization techniques have beneficial effects in patients with primary AC of the shoulder. It reported that the Maitland technique and spine mobilization, combined with glenohumeral stretching and both angular and translational mobilization, seem to be most beneficial in reducing pain.…”

Section: Manual Therapymentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Three studies 5,6,21 were scored as high quality, and 3 were scored as acceptable quality. [39][40][41] Two of the high-quality studies were conducted by the same research team. 5,6 The first meta-analysis reviewed the evidence of electrotherapy modalities, delivered alone or in combination with other interventions, for the treatment of AC.…”

Section: Adhesive Capsulitismentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Review of Nondrug, Nonsurgical Treatment of Shoulder Conditions

Hawk

Minkalis

Khorsan

et al. 2017

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of conservative nondrug, nonsurgical interventions, either alone or in combination, for conditions of the shoulder. Methods: The review was conducted from March 2016 to November 2016 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and was registered with PROSPERO. Eligibility criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, or meta-analyses studying adult patients with a shoulder diagnosis. Interventions qualified if they did not involve prescription medication or surgical procedures, although these could be used in the comparison group or groups. At least 2 independent reviewers assessed the quality of each study using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklists. Shoulder conditions addressed were shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS), rotator cuff-associated disorders (RCs), adhesive capsulitis (AC), and nonspecific shoulder pain. Results: Twenty-five systematic reviews and 44 RCTs met inclusion criteria. Low-to moderate-quality evidence supported the use of manual therapies for all 4 shoulder conditions. Exercise, particularly combined with physical therapy protocols, was beneficial for SIS and AC. For SIS, moderate evidence supported several passive modalities. For RC, physical therapy protocols were found beneficial but not superior to surgery in the long term. Moderate evidence supported extracorporeal shockwave therapy for calcific tendinitis RC. Low-level laser was the only modality for which there was moderate evidence supporting its use for all 4 conditions. Conclusion: The findings of this literature review may help inform practitioners who use conservative methods (eg, doctors of chiropractic, physical therapists, and other manual therapists) regarding the levels of evidence for modalities used for common shoulder conditions. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2017;40:293-319)

show abstract

“…Many treatments have been proposed for FS including conservative (i.e. manual therapy) [4], and non-conservative approaches (i.e. arthroscopic capsular release) [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Central Nervous System Focused Treatment Program for People with Frozen Shoulder: A Feasibility Study.

Horno

Dueñas

Lluch

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a highly disabling pathology of poorly understood etiology, which is characterized by the presence of intense pain and progressive loss of range of motion (ROM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical impact of a CNS-focused treatment program for people with frozen shoulder (FS).Methods: 10 subjects with primary FS received a 10 weeks CNS-focused intervention including sensory discrimination training and graded motor imagery techniques delivered as clinic sessions (60 minutes) and home therapy (30 minutes five times per week). Measurements were taken at baseline, after a 2-weeks washout period, after treatment and at three months follow-up. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was the primary outcome. Secondary measures were: feasibility-related outcomes, self-reported shoulder pain, active and passive range of motion, two-point discrimination threshold (TPDT), left/right judgement task (LRJT), fear-avoidance (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), pain catastrophization (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) and pain sensitization (Central Sensitization Inventory).Results: 70% of participants completed the treatment. No significant changes were found after washout period except for TPDT (p=0.02) and SPADI (p=0.025). Improvements in self-reported shoulder pain (p=0.028) and active shoulder flexion (p=0.016) were shown after treatment (p=0.028) and follow-up (p=0.001) and in SPADI at follow-up (p=0.008). No significant changes were observed in TPDT, LRJT, fear-avoidance, pain catastrophization and pain sensitization. Conclusions: a CNS-focused treatment program might be a suitable approach to improve pain and disability in FS but further research is needed to draw firm conclusions.Trial registration: Clinical Trials. NCT03320200. Registered 25 October 25 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03320200?term=NCT03320200&draw=2&rank=1

show abstract

Efficacy of Different Types of Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Primary Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Overall, mobilization techniques have beneficial effects in patients with primary AC of the shoulder. Because of preliminary evidence for many mobilization techniques, the Maitland technique and combined mobilizations seem recommended at the moment.

Cited by 66 publications

References 28 publications

American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline

American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline

Systematic Review of Nondrug, Nonsurgical Treatment of Shoulder Conditions

A Central Nervous System Focused Treatment Program for People with Frozen Shoulder: A Feasibility Study.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About