2012
DOI: 10.3109/15622975.2012.708438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of different protocols of transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of tinnitus: Pooled analysis of two randomized controlled studies

Abstract: This large study demonstrates the safety and tolerability of rTMS treatment in patients with chronic tinnitus. While the overall effect did not prove superior to placebo, secondary outcome parameters argue in favour of the active stimulation groups, and specifically the combined frontal and temporal rTMS protocol.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
106
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
106
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…All studies show an improvement in the rTMS group, and all studies but one [Marcondes et al, 2010] show an improvement in the placebo group. This positive effect of rTMS is, in agreement with our study, only small in 2 of these studies [Anders et al, 2010;Langguth et al, 2012]. One of these studies shows, in line with our study, no significant difference between rTMS and placebo treatment , the other shows that the improvement for both rTMS and placebo is significant compared with baseline, but it does not compare the groups with each other [Anders et al, 2010].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…All studies show an improvement in the rTMS group, and all studies but one [Marcondes et al, 2010] show an improvement in the placebo group. This positive effect of rTMS is, in agreement with our study, only small in 2 of these studies [Anders et al, 2010;Langguth et al, 2012]. One of these studies shows, in line with our study, no significant difference between rTMS and placebo treatment , the other shows that the improvement for both rTMS and placebo is significant compared with baseline, but it does not compare the groups with each other [Anders et al, 2010].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In contrast, 1 study correcting for possible confounding effects [Lehner et al, 2012] did not find a relationship. Along that line and opposing a positive effect of normal hearing, the study of Langguth et al [2012] included only patients with near-to-normal hearing (average thresholds: 16 dB hearing level, HL, in placebo patients, and 14 dB HL in rTMS patients), but it did not find an effect of rTMS. It could be postulated that rTMS for tinnitus exerts its effect by a positive effect on depression.…”
Section: Bilateral Rtms For Tinnitusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There has been an article presenting that the elevated AHI was largely due to central apnea, but not obstructive apnea, for the age range from 65 years and over [37], hence, central apnea predicts mortality above age 65 years; others also published similar data [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%