2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of depletion models for estimating abundance of endangered fishes in streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a hierarchical multinomial N-mixture model on double-pass electrofishing data, the study estimated the magnitude and uncertainty of capture probability and abundance for seven common fish species in wadeable Pannonian lowland streams. Similarly to many other studies (Benejam et al, 2012;Harris et al, 2016;Hedger et al, 2018;Peterson & Cederholm, 1984;Riley et al, 1993;Riley & Fausch, 1992), data showed that efficacy of electrofishing is not perfect, single-pass sampling resulted in a catch less than the true population size, and capture probability varied across the species (Mollenhauer et al, 2018;Price & Peterson, 2010;Reid et al, 2009;Stewart et al, 2019), although its stochastic fluctuations were too wide to identify sharp differences between the species. Stochastic fluctuation of capture probability is likely enhanced when stream reaches with very different environmental characteristics are sampled.…”
Section: Relationship Between Estimation Uncertainty and Densitysupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using a hierarchical multinomial N-mixture model on double-pass electrofishing data, the study estimated the magnitude and uncertainty of capture probability and abundance for seven common fish species in wadeable Pannonian lowland streams. Similarly to many other studies (Benejam et al, 2012;Harris et al, 2016;Hedger et al, 2018;Peterson & Cederholm, 1984;Riley et al, 1993;Riley & Fausch, 1992), data showed that efficacy of electrofishing is not perfect, single-pass sampling resulted in a catch less than the true population size, and capture probability varied across the species (Mollenhauer et al, 2018;Price & Peterson, 2010;Reid et al, 2009;Stewart et al, 2019), although its stochastic fluctuations were too wide to identify sharp differences between the species. Stochastic fluctuation of capture probability is likely enhanced when stream reaches with very different environmental characteristics are sampled.…”
Section: Relationship Between Estimation Uncertainty and Densitysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The model used in this study can be extended for allowing separate estimations of capture probability for the passes of a data set with three or more passes, and then testing of the decline in catchability becomes possible. In that case, even if the catchability proved to be constant, the increased number of passes would likely improve the estimations of the model (Riley & Fausch, 1992;Stewart et al, 2019).…”
Section: Issue Of Equal Catchabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We restricted the table of frequency categories for analysis to those categories containing more than five individuals, and we used Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test statistics (χ 2 ) to draw inferences while controlling for lake, with the Bonferroni correction used to reduce the chance of a type I error (Agresti 2002). We used a multispecies Bayesian mixture model to link the individuals collected from the temporally replicated samples to a latent abundance state at a site within each lake to quantify detection and true local abundance (Stewart et al 2017(Stewart et al , 2019. Therefore, we consider the experimental design where the observed catch histories represent a sequence of replicated counts of unmarked fish (y) for panfish species j at each site i = 1, 2,. .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a multispecies Bayesian mixture model to link the individuals collected from the temporally replicated samples to a latent abundance state at a site within each lake to quantify detection and true local abundance (Stewart et al 2017, 2019). Therefore, we consider the experimental design where the observed catch histories represent a sequence of replicated counts of unmarked fish ( y ) for panfish species j at each site i = 1, 2,…, R within k = 1, … , K lakes for a total of t = 1, …, T replicate sampling occasions (Stewart and Long 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%