Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common functional gastrointestinal disorder. There is no definitive treatment for IBS and all medications implemented in its treatment have concerns of tolerability and safety associated with their use. The WH67®-R-2012 study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial comparing the effect of humic acids versus placebo in patients with diarrhoeapredominant IBS (IBS-D). The primary endpoint of the study was an improvement of IBS symptoms measured with the irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system (IBS-SSS). Secondary endpoints were improvements in quality of life (IBS-QOL), the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), and in the short form 36 (SF-36). Forty-six patients were recruited to participate in the study. No adverse events were reported and no patient discontinued the study. There was no main effect for treatment (F=1.56, p=0.221), centre (F=1.71, p=0.201), or sex (F=2.47, p=0.127). We defined a response to treatment as an improvement of at least 50 points on the IBS-SSS. 57.9% of patients responded to treatment with humic acids and 36.8% of patients responded to treatment with placebo (χ 2 =1. 69, p=0.194). In patients receiving humic acids, women were more likely to be responders than men (71.4% vs. 20.0%, χ 2 =4.00, p=0.045). This was the first study testing the effect of humic acids as a potential treatment for IBS-D. No adverse events were reported, reflecting the very good tolerability of humic acids. If proven efficacious in a larger study, humic acids could represent a novel treatment option, which is much-needed for IBS-D.