2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of buffered hypertonic seawater in different phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized double-blind study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…85 Finally, a recent study compared NI with buffered HS to physiological seawater in patients with CRSwNP post-FESS but further characterized them as eosinophilic (ECRSwNP) and noneosinophilic (NECRSwNP) phenotypes. 86 They found that as a group, there were substantial subjective and objective improvements with NI irrespective of the solution used; however, when patients were stratified based on ECRSwNP and NECRSwNP, the latter group treated with buffered HS experienced a greater improvement in mucosal edema and crusting immediately postoperatively and substantial objective improvement in Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores and saccharine clearance times. 86…”
Section: Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…85 Finally, a recent study compared NI with buffered HS to physiological seawater in patients with CRSwNP post-FESS but further characterized them as eosinophilic (ECRSwNP) and noneosinophilic (NECRSwNP) phenotypes. 86 They found that as a group, there were substantial subjective and objective improvements with NI irrespective of the solution used; however, when patients were stratified based on ECRSwNP and NECRSwNP, the latter group treated with buffered HS experienced a greater improvement in mucosal edema and crusting immediately postoperatively and substantial objective improvement in Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores and saccharine clearance times. 86…”
Section: Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…86 They found that as a group, there were substantial subjective and objective improvements with NI irrespective of the solution used; however, when patients were stratified based on ECRSwNP and NECRSwNP, the latter group treated with buffered HS experienced a greater improvement in mucosal edema and crusting immediately postoperatively and substantial objective improvement in Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores and saccharine clearance times. 86…”
Section: Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in in vivo studies of patients with CRS, the difference in the improvement of patient symptoms according to tonicity is unclear. Three RCTs reported that isotonic saline was more helpful in improving the symptoms of patients with CRS [52][53][54], and two studies reported no differences between isotonic and hypertonic saline [51,55]. On the contrary, two RCTs and one systematic review showed that hypertonic saline helped improve symptoms compared to isotonic saline [56][57][58].…”
Section: Supporting Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro studies have reported that hypertonic saline reduces nasal mucosal edema and increases the ciliary beat frequency [ 51 ]. However, in in vivo studies of patients with CRS, the difference in the improvement of patient symptoms according to tonicity is unclear.…”
Section: Key Action Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an in vitro study comparing non-diluted seawater and normal saline using airway epithelial cells suggested that non-diluted seawater improved ciliary beat frequency and wound repair speed [18]. Recently, clinical studies using hypertonic seawater irrigation identified that hypertonic seawater was effective for reducing the symptom score and endoscopic score in aspirin-induced CRS as well as CRS with nasal polyps [19,20].…”
Section: Salinementioning
confidence: 99%