Efficacy of biorational insecticides against chilli thrips, <i>Scirtothrips dorsalis</i> (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), infesting roses under nursery conditions

Aristizábal, Luis F.; Chen, Y.; Cherry, Ron; Cave, Ronald D.; Arthurs, Steven

doi:10.1111/jen.12340

Cited by 10 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thrips, mite and borer pests in chilli were effectively controlled through integrated pest management approaches including bio-pesticides and other mechanical practices such as sticky trap [15,17] . In this study, our results demonstrated that the lowermost Thrips population was documented from the blue sticky trap and pheromone mass trapping along with spraying of Fizimite and Biotrin treated plots (Table 1).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated management of thrips-mite and borer complex attacking chilli

Rashid¹,

Dutta²,

Sarkar³

et al. 2022

J. Entomol. Zool. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thrips, mite and borer complex are the most serious insect pests which reduce chilli yield remarkably in many chilli growing areas. This study exposed that sustainable bio-rational based management packages including different mechanical approaches and bio-pesticides were effective against Thrips, mite and borer pests in chilli. The results indicated that, spraying of Sodium lauryl ether sulphate (Fizimite) and Matrine (Biotrin) along with blue sticky trap and pheromone mass trapping of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura was most effective against Thrips, mites and borer pests. The lowest number of Thrips and fruit borer infestation was observed from spraying of Sodium lauryl ether sulphate (Fizimite) and Matrine (Biotrin) along with blue sticky trap and pheromone mass trapping of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura treated plots. The highest yield (20.93 t/ha) and net income (145525 Tk/ha) were also obtained from spraying of Sodium lauryl ether sulphate (Fizimite) and Matrine (Biotrin) along with blue sticky trap and pheromone mass trapping of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura treated plots. Only application of chemical insecticides is not effective against the insect pest's population in a longterm. In contrast, mechanical approaches such as sticky trap, pheromone trap as well as different biopesticides are environmental, economical, dependable and that facilitate the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) concept.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated management of thrips-mite and borer complex attacking chilli

Rashid¹,

Dutta²,

Sarkar³

et al. 2022

J. Entomol. Zool. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Aristizabal et al (2016) also found that spinosad conserved natural enemies, which matches our laboratory results but is not reflected in our field trial. Despite this, given our efficacy results and those of others, an effective S. dorsalis IPM program may include an initial application of spinosad to reduce pest abundance followed by a high rate application of cyantraniliprole, which provided extended protection through 35 d in the field (Bielza & Guillen 2015;Aristizábal et al 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 66%

“…For the field trial portion of this study, the neonicoti-noid/pyrethroid combination product was deleted (Table 1). Spinosad is a reduced-risk insecticide currently recommended as an effective S. dorsalis management tool (Ludwig & Bogran 2007;Kumar et al 2013;Aristizábal et al 2017). Cyantraniliprole also is a reduced-risk product labeled for thrips control on ornamental plants (EPA 2017).…”

Section: Insecticidesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, evidence of the negative effects of neonicotinoids on non-target beneficial arthropods has highlighted the need for alternative products that can be incorporated into IPM programs (Larson et al 2012;Goulson & Kleijn 2013;Larson et al 2013). Fortunately, alternative technologies have proven effective and new chemistries are becoming available for ornamental plant protection (Doğramaci et al 2011;Arthurs et al 2012;Kumar et al 2016;Aristizábal et al 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of Reduced-Risk Insecticides to Control Chilli Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Conserve Natural Enemies on Ornamental Plants

Dale

Borden

2018

Florida Entomologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ornamental plants provide valuable services that benefit people and the environment. Herbivorous insects, particularly invasive pests with little resistance from natural enemies or plant defenses, damage plants and reduce the beneficial services they provide. Reduced-risk insecticides are valuable tools to selectively reduce target pests and protect plants while presumably conserving natural enemies. Herein, we conducted 2 separate tests of a new reduced-risk insecticide, cyantraniliprole, and industry standards for the control of Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), a damaging invasive insect pest of ornamental plants. We also evaluated each insecticide's compatibility with Orius insidiosus Say (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), an important natural enemy of S. dorsalis. During laboratory evaluations, we found that spinosad was superior in acute toxicity to S. dorsalis and compatibility with O. insidiosus. Cyantraniliprole was consistently moderately toxic to S. dorsalis and O. insidiosus under lab conditions. In the field study, we found that all reduced-risk insecticides had no detectable effect on natural enemy abundance. Cyantraniliprole provided the best plant protection, with 70% less damage than the untreated control. Importantly, the effect of cyantraniliprole on S. dorsalis and plant protection depended on the application rate, such that the lowest rate tested did not reduce damage. This study demonstrates IPM tactics for managing an important invasive pest with a combination of chemical and biological control. As non-target effects of commonly used insecticides are becoming better understood, safer tools are needed to protect beneficial organisms, ornamental plants, and their services.

show abstract

“…En cuanto a hongos entomopatógenos, los más conocidos para el control de trips son Beauveria bassiana, Neozygites parvispora y Verticillium lecanii (Castineiras et al, 1996;Pardey 2009;Aristizábal et al, 2017), también se reporta a Metarhizium anisopliae como eficaz en el control de adultos y pupas de trips (Maniania et al, 2003;Ansari et al, 2007). Wang et al (2011) identificaron varias cepas del hongo B. bassiana altamente virulentas tanto para larvas como para adultos de F. occidentalis.…”

Section: Alternativas Para El Control Biológico De Tripsunclassified

Manejo sustentable de plagas de cítricos, en el valle de Apatzingán, Michoacán, México

Miranda-Salcedo¹

2019

Sustentabilidad Turismo Y Educación

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenEn el valle de Apatzingán, a partir de la llegada de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama en 2006, se incrementaron las aplicaciones de productos químicos en cítricos, debido a que es el vector del Huanglongbing (HLB). Para el control de este insecto se han hecho aplicaciones excesivas de insecticidas, lo que ha ocasionado el desarrollo de resistencia de D. citri a varios productos, además de ocasionar la resurgencia de plagas secundarias como trips, ácaros, minador de la hoja, mosca prieta y mosca blanca. El objetivo del trabajo fue identificar los picos poblacionales de D. citri en el valle de Apatzingán y sus enemigos naturales, determinar la efectividad de diferentes insecticidas en el control de D. citri y evaluar la presencia y daño por de trips. Se realizaron diferentes estudios a partir del año 2000 hasta 2019 para conocer la dinámica poblacional de D. citri, destacando su incremento en septiembre, diciembre, abril y julio. En el caso de los trips, sus poblaciones se incrementan de noviembre a mayo y decrecen de junio a octubre. Destaca la presencia de enemigos naturales como C. rufilabris y C. cincta y Zelus renardi, Stethorus sp., y diferentes especies de arañas.Diaphorina citri, fluctuación poblacional, trips. AbstractIn the Apatzingan valley, from the arrival of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama in 2006, chemical applications in citrus fruits increased, because it is the vector of Huanglongbing (HLB). Excessive applications of insecticides have been made for the control of this insect, which has caused the development of resistance of D. citri to several products, in addition to causing the resurgence of secondary pests such as thrips, mites, leaf miner, blackfly and whitefly. The goal of the work was to identify the population fluctuation of D. citri in the Apatzingan valley and its natural enemies, determine the effectiveness of different insecticides in the control of D. citri and evaluate the presence and damage by thrips. Different studies were carried out from the year 2000 to 2019 to know the population dynamics of D. citri, highlighting its increase in september, december, april and july. In the case of thrips, their populations increase from november to may and decrease from june to october. The presence of natural enemies was identified such as C. rufilabris and C. cincta and Zelus renardi, Stethorus sp., and different species of spiders.

show abstract

Efficacy of biorational insecticides against chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), infesting roses under nursery conditions

Cited by 10 publications

References 34 publications

Integrated management of thrips-mite and borer complex attacking chilli

Integrated management of thrips-mite and borer complex attacking chilli

Evaluation of Reduced-Risk Insecticides to Control Chilli Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Conserve Natural Enemies on Ornamental Plants

Manejo sustentable de plagas de cítricos, en el valle de Apatzingán, Michoacán, México

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About