2020
DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_17_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Baska mask and Laryngeal mask airway supreme during positive pressure ventilation – A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…seconds, p=0.035] (Table 3). Nasogastric tube insertion time was shorter in the Baska mask group when compared to the LMA Protector [14 (12-15) seconds versus 17 (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) seconds; p=0.003]. Fiberoptic views were comparable among the groups (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…seconds, p=0.035] (Table 3). Nasogastric tube insertion time was shorter in the Baska mask group when compared to the LMA Protector [14 (12-15) seconds versus 17 (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) seconds; p=0.003]. Fiberoptic views were comparable among the groups (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bulgular: Demografik verileri ve havayolu karakteristikleri gruplar arasında benzerdi. Baska mask grubunun yerleştirme zamanı kısaydı [14'e (11-20) kıyasla 20 (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) saniye, p=0,035]. Yerleştirme sırasında ihtiyaç duyulan optimizasyon manevraları Baska mask grubunda fazlaydı (p=0,009).…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar sealing pressures with BM have been described earlier. [ 5 25 26 27 ] Total airway manipulation took 2 min longer in Group ETT due to the additional time taken for throat pack insertion and fixation of the ETT to the left angle of the mouth. Although statistically significant, a 2 min longer time taken in handling the airway for throat pack cannot be considered clinically relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of this device during positive pressure ventilation has been shown. [ 5 6 ] However its effectiveness in protecting the lower airway from contamination during nasal surgeries has not yet been investigated. We hypothesised that the BM is non-inferior to the Tracheal tube in preventing tracheal contamination during nasal surgeries and aimed to study the effectiveness of BM for nasal surgeries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%