1993
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420210129021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Autotransfusion in Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract: Autotransfusion is a safe and effective procedure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(2 reference statements)
4
70
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Where filters are not used, most studies showed tumour cells passing through the cell saver [29,[33][34][35][36] though some types of cancer cells appeared to be removed by centrifugation, washing and a standard 40 micron filter [37]. In the 1990s there were several in-vitro clearance studies using early leucocyte depletion filters which claimed to show total removal of malignant cells [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where filters are not used, most studies showed tumour cells passing through the cell saver [29,[33][34][35][36] though some types of cancer cells appeared to be removed by centrifugation, washing and a standard 40 micron filter [37]. In the 1990s there were several in-vitro clearance studies using early leucocyte depletion filters which claimed to show total removal of malignant cells [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the in-vivo evidence has shown that cancer patients receiving cell salvaged blood do not get increased rates of recurrences or increased mortality, and there has been considerable clinical use of cell salvage in all types of cancer surgeryparticularly urology, over the last 20 years. Up to 2003 the evidence consisted of a small number of case reports and observational studies [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59], and has been criticised as a result [50]. However, they do show no difference in recurrence rate with intra-operative cell salvage or a better outcome compared with allogeneic transfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 Malignancy recurrence or metastases secondary to perioperative transfusion practices is a difficult field of study given the heterogeneity of the clinical circumstance, the type and stage of cancer, and the long follow-up times required. Nonetheless, 15 clinical studies have been published reporting outcomes on patients who received transfusion of ICS blood intraoperatively during malignancy surgery [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] (Table 3). The majority of these studies were single-centre non-randomized small studies where the outcome of patients who received intraoperative ICS blood was compared with historic or case controls.…”
Section: Clinical Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple surgical programs have continued to recognize both the potential benefit of autologous transfusion Cell salvage in oncologic surgery 1065 Table 3 Tumour recurrence in patients who received intraoperative autotransfusion of ICS blood during malignancy surgery-clinical studies and the potential harm of allogeneic transfusion, and they have persisted in offering ICS (± perioperative autologous donation) to their patients undergoing resection of malignancy. 66,69,70,72,74,76 This practice has afforded more than 20 years of experience from some of these teams who clearly have experienced benefit rather than detriment to their patients. The current body of in vitro evidence together with a growing clinical experience suggest that ICS should not be withheld from patients with malignancy.…”
Section: Evolution Of Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 1986 and 1999, six studies (population size 20 to 54 patients) on patients operated for urogynecological cancer (n = 4) and hepatic cancer (n = 2) showed no change in the short-or medium-term survival, hence no metastatic dissemination. [11][12][13][14][15][16] All studies were performed as either a historic comparison or comparison with matched subjects. Randomized studies were not conducted.…”
Section: Patient Survival After Use Of the Cell Saver In Cancer Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%