Efficacy of arm crank ergometry on individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate the efficacy of arm crank ergometry (ACE) on physical, psychological, and quality of life outcomes in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).Literature SurveyA comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Web of Science, REHABDATA, and Embase from inception until July 2023.MethodologyStudies were included if the sample was composed of individuals with SCI, the intervention followed an ACE intervention, and the study was a randomized controlled trial including at least one outcome measure evaluating physical, psychological, or quality of life. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The meta‐analysis was not feasible due to the heterogeneity in the treatment protocols and outcome measures among the selected studies.SynthesisOf 1013 articles, seven studies (n = 200), with 16% of participants being female, were included in this review. The scores on the PEDro scale ranged from 6 to 8, with a median score of 7. There were variations in treatment protocols and outcome measures, resulting in heterogeneous findings. The effects of the ACE interventions on physical, psychological, and quality of life outcomes showed inconsistency.ConclusionsACE training proves to be a suitable and safe intervention for individuals with traumatic SCI. Nevertheless, the existing evidence concerning its effects on physical, psychological, and quality of life outcomes in individuals with SCI is limited. Further trials are required to investigate the effects of various ACE training protocols on SCI populations.