2022
DOI: 10.1056/nejmc2207519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Antibodies and Antiviral Drugs against Omicron BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5 Subvariants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

7
169
1
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
7
169
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The main drawback of the mAbs described here is their comparatively low in vitro neutralization potency. These mAbs fit into a wider trend of a trade-off between potency and breadth: Highly potent mAbs that target the RBD are restricted to sarbecoviruses and most do not neutralize all variants of SARS-CoV-2 ( 3 , 5 , 6 , 20 , 30 ), whereas mAbs that target the stem helix ( 12 16 ) and those identified here have greater breadth but are less potent. However, as previously reported for at least one antistem helix mAb ( 15 ), COV44-79 performed better than expected in the hamster model, which suggests that it may function in a way that is not captured effectively in the neutralization assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The main drawback of the mAbs described here is their comparatively low in vitro neutralization potency. These mAbs fit into a wider trend of a trade-off between potency and breadth: Highly potent mAbs that target the RBD are restricted to sarbecoviruses and most do not neutralize all variants of SARS-CoV-2 ( 3 , 5 , 6 , 20 , 30 ), whereas mAbs that target the stem helix ( 12 16 ) and those identified here have greater breadth but are less potent. However, as previously reported for at least one antistem helix mAb ( 15 ), COV44-79 performed better than expected in the hamster model, which suggests that it may function in a way that is not captured effectively in the neutralization assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, some immunocompromised patients do not respond well to COVID-19 vaccines (29). and several monoclonal antibody treatments have now ceased to be effective due to antigenic variation of the omicron variant (30). However, tixagevimab/cilgavimab retains activity against omicron sub-variants BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5, but is not available for routine clinical care in the UK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, BA.4/BA.5, which shared identical sequence of the spike protein, contained additional mutations (Del69-70, L452R, F486V and R493Q) compared to BA.2 ( Fig. 1C ), and become dominant in several major regions of the world, including US and China 14 . These phenomena indicate rapid dynamics of the viral evolution, leading to substantial changes in infectivity, antigenic escape, reduction of vaccine efficacy, and increased possibility of repeat infections 3, 8, 13, 15, 16 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although vaccines are available, therapeutic antibodies remain critical for infected and especially hospitalized patients. However, few clinical monoclonal antibodies can retain substantial activities against all Omicron sublineages 13 , urging for more and therapeutic options 14, 17 . Therefore, it is critical to rapidly develop countermeasures such as new antibodies against these sublineages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%