2018
DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4946.18.05175-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of anthropometric measures for identifying cardiovascular disease risk in adolescents: review and meta-analysis

Abstract: C (2018) Efficacy of anthropometric measures for identifying cardiovascular disease risk in adolescents: review and meta-analysis. Minerva Pediatrica, 70 (4). pp. 371-382.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Blood pressure was the only variable that entered the factor analysis out of those selected as potential metabolic variables. The relationship between BMI and blood pressure is well documented [ 54 ], and blood pressure therefore fits well in a body size factor. However, blood pressure can also be an indicator for other metabolic variables [ 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Blood pressure was the only variable that entered the factor analysis out of those selected as potential metabolic variables. The relationship between BMI and blood pressure is well documented [ 54 ], and blood pressure therefore fits well in a body size factor. However, blood pressure can also be an indicator for other metabolic variables [ 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Circumference measurements are cheap and simple anthropometric methods, and both hip/gluteal circumference and waist circumference are good predictors of intra-abdominal fat and cardiovascular risk factors [20,21]. WC is considered the most accurate anthropometric method to predict metabolic syndrome (MetS) in children [22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicators of abdominal obesity (AO), such as waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), have been considered better Cardiovascular disease (CVD) discriminators than overall obesity. 5 These are simple and low-cost indicators that can be used for early intervention. 5 In Brazil, the prevalence of obesity increased from 11.8% in 2006 to 19.8% in 2018, an increase of 67.8% in thirteen years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%