Efficacy of a New Coating of Implantabutment Connections in Reducing Bacterial Loading: An in Vitro Study

Lauritano, D; Ca, Bignozzi; Pazzi, Daniele; Curá, Francesca Maria

doi:10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.001

Cited by 11 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addiction, the patientrelated susceptibility is a critical factor for disease onset. So, every factor favouring oral biofilm formation (poor oral hygiene), host defence capability (smoking habit, excessive alcohol consumption, genetic traits, history of periodontitis, use of bisphosphonates), might favour developing of peri-implantis and periodontal disease, which diagnosis and treatment require dentist's engagement (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). This new surgical procedure for IMC treatment has been created new interfaces with the implants: implant-periodontal ligament, implantcement, implant-dentine, and an implant-pulp and implant-enamel interfaces (33).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of Maxillary Retained Canine With Implants: New Perspectives

Haddad¹,

Calcaterra

Ge³

et al. 2017

ORL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYPurpose. The surgical-orthodontic treatment of impacted maxillary canine (IMC) remains a challenge to today's clinicians. The aim of the present paper is to describe an unconventional treatment of IMC with insertion of implant into the retained canine and 3 years follow-up. Case report. A 55-year-old female patient attended to rehabilitate her maxillary left canine site. An unconventional approach was proposed to the patient. A large diameter tapered implant (Ø 5 x 18 mm) was inserted (Nobel Active, Kolten, Swisse). An immediate loading prosthetic rehabilitation was performed. After checking for implant stability the prosthetic steps were carried out and a single crown was delivered with Procera system. Conclusion. The patient was happy of this kind of single non-invasive session for treating IMC. At the 3-year control, the implant did not show any mobility or signs of peri-implantitis clinically or radiographically. In addiction patient was satisfied of aesthetic results.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of Maxillary Retained Canine With Implants: New Perspectives

Haddad¹,

Calcaterra

Ge³

et al. 2017

ORL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finally, we can say that the conical implant connection system is more favorable insofar as the maintenance of the marginal bone is concerned [7,22,[26][27][28][29][30][31].…”

Section: Conicalmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Implant–Abutment Connection on Clinical Outcomes and Microbial Colonization: A Narrative Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Osseointegration are often suffering from oral conditions, especially, the micro gap at the implant–abutment connection represents a site for bacterial plaque aggregation, leading to increased inflammatory cells and causing peri-implantitis. Aim: The aim of this narrative review was to describe the different kinds of implant–abutment connections and their ability to reduce bacterial leakage and thus prevent peri-implantitis. Materials and methods: The following databases were consulted: Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Research gate and a total of 528 articles were found. After reading the abstract and titles, 473 items were excluded. The remaining articles (n = 55) were assessed for full-text eligibility. Thirty-three studies were included in the review. Results and Conclusions: We selected 22 clinical trials and 11 reviews, examining a total sample of 2110 implants. From the review, it was clear that there exists a relationship between the implant–abutment interface and bacterial leakage. All the connections presented an amount of micro-gap and bacterial micro-leakage, though conical and mixed connection systems seemed to behave better. Moreover, both connections seemed to have a better load distribution and the mixed system also had anti-rotational properties which are very useful during the positioning of the prosthesis.

show abstract

“…In addiction, the patient-related susceptibility is a critical factor for disease onset. So, every factor favouring oral biofilm formation (poor oral hygiene), host defence capability (smoking habit, excessive alcohol consumption, genetic traits, history of periodontitis, oral mucosal lesions and prosthetics), might favour developing of peri-implantis and periodontal disease in SDIs, which diagnosis and treatment require dentist's engagement (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A New Spiral Dental Implant: A Tool for Oral Rehabilitation of Difficult Cases

Balan¹,

Calcaterra

Lauritano

et al. 2017

ORL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYSpiral dental implant (SDI) is an implant with a conical internal helix that confers the characteristic of self-drilling, self-tapping, and self-bone condensing. These proprieties offer better control during insertion of SDI giving a high primary stabilization, even in poor quality bone. A shorter diameter of SDI results in reduced drilling during insertion and consequently less trauma and minimal bone loss. To address the research purpose, the investigators designed a retrospective cohort study. The study population was composed of 25 patients, 11 males and 14 females that have been treated by Dr. Balan with 187 SDI positioned in mandible and into maxilla bone. The implants were placed during the years 2013 to 2014 in Dr. Balan clinic. All patients underwent the same surgical protocol. Several variables are investigated: demographic (age and gender), anatomic (upper/lower jaws and tooth site), implant (length and diameter and type) variables, edentulism (partial or total), and comorbid status of health (i.e.: hypothyroidism, parodontitis, hypertension, diabetes, presence of cancer, heart disease, hepatitis and rheumatologic disease). Pearson Chi-Square test was used to investigate variables and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistically it has been shown that females have a higher possibility of unsuccessful respect of male, with a "p value" of 0.014. Another important impact factor for success of implant insertion has been represented by concomitants pathologies: cancer represents the most negative high factor risk with a percentage of unsuccessful of 50%, followed by heart disease (15%), and diabetes (3.7%). SDIs are reliable tools for difficult cases of oral rehabilitation. They have a higher success and survival rate, which means stable results over time. No differences were detected among SDI lengths, implant/crown ratio. In addition, the insertion of SDIs in banked bone can be performed without adverse effects. Finally, flapless and computer tomography-planned surgery does not significantly increase the clinical outcome of SDIs in complex rehabilitation. Cancer represents the most important variable to consider when a patient wants to do oral rehabilitation because of its high risk of unsuccessful.

show abstract

Efficacy of a New Coating of Implantabutment Connections in Reducing Bacterial Loading: An in Vitro Study

Cited by 11 publications

References 44 publications

Treatment of Maxillary Retained Canine With Implants: New Perspectives

Treatment of Maxillary Retained Canine With Implants: New Perspectives

The Impact of Implant–Abutment Connection on Clinical Outcomes and Microbial Colonization: A Narrative Review

A New Spiral Dental Implant: A Tool for Oral Rehabilitation of Difficult Cases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About