2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13567-021-00895-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of a multivalent vaccine against Fasciola hepatica infection in sheep

Abstract: In this work we report the protection found in a vaccination trial performed in sheep with two different vaccines composed each one by a cocktail of antigens (rCL1, rPrx, rHDM and rLAP) formulated in two different adjuvants (Montanide ISA 61 VG (G1) and Alhydrogel®(G2)). The parameters of protection tested were fluke burden, faecal egg count and evaluation of hepatic lesions. In vaccinated group 1 we found a significant decrease in fluke burden in comparison to both unimmunised and infected control group (37.2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last few decades, progress has been made in the isolation, characterisation and testing of a number of native and recombinant molecules as vaccines against liver fluke disease in ruminant hosts ( 33 ). However, data from vaccine trials have been inconsistent ( 14 ), and some recent trials with recombinant antigens failed to induce protection against fluke infection ( 20 ) or achieved only a minor reduction of fluke burdens ( 34 ). In spite of evidence that effective vaccination may be possible, design of smart vaccines will require more knowledge about the immune response to F. hepatica , which can be provided by big-data approaches such as transcriptomics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few decades, progress has been made in the isolation, characterisation and testing of a number of native and recombinant molecules as vaccines against liver fluke disease in ruminant hosts ( 33 ). However, data from vaccine trials have been inconsistent ( 14 ), and some recent trials with recombinant antigens failed to induce protection against fluke infection ( 20 ) or achieved only a minor reduction of fluke burdens ( 34 ). In spite of evidence that effective vaccination may be possible, design of smart vaccines will require more knowledge about the immune response to F. hepatica , which can be provided by big-data approaches such as transcriptomics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few decades, progress has been made in the isolation, characterisation and testing of a number of native and recombinant molecules as vaccines against liver fluke disease in ruminant hosts (Toet et al, 2014). However, data from vaccine trials have been inconsistent (Molina-Hernández et al, 2015), and some recent trials with recombinant antigens failed to induce protection against fluke infection (Fu et al, 2016) or achieved only a minor reduction of fluke burdens (Zafra et al, 2021). In spite of evidence that effective vaccination may be possible, design of smart vaccines will require more knowledge about the immune response to F. hepatica , which can be provided by big-data approaches such as transcriptomics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groups VAC1 (n = 10) and VAC2 (n = 10) were immunized subcutaneously with two doses, 4 weeks apart, of a multivalent vaccine. The formulation of the two vaccines assessed in this study were published previously by [11] finding a reduction of fluke burden (37.2%) and egg output (28.71%) in comparison to IC group. Briefly, each vaccine dose (2 mL) contained a cocktail of F. hepatica recombinant proteins including cathepsin L1 (rFhCL1), peroxiredoxin (rFhPrx), helminth defence molecules (rFhHDM), and leucine aminopeptidase (rFhLAP) at a concentration of 100 μg per antigen emulsified in two different adjuvants, Montanide ISA 61 VG (Seppic, Puteaux, France) and Alhydrogel ® adjuvant 2% (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA), respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Briefly, each vaccine dose (2 mL) contained a cocktail of F. hepatica recombinant proteins including cathepsin L1 (rFhCL1), peroxiredoxin (rFhPrx), helminth defence molecules (rFhHDM), and leucine aminopeptidase (rFhLAP) at a concentration of 100 μg per antigen emulsified in two different adjuvants, Montanide ISA 61 VG (Seppic, Puteaux, France) and Alhydrogel ® adjuvant 2% (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA), respectively. The F. hepatica recombinant proteins were obtained as described [11]. Group IC (n = 10) was unimmunized and infected; and group UC (n = 7) was unimmunized and uninfected.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%