2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/7807432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of 27-Gauge Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Epiretinal Membrane in Glaucoma Patients

Abstract: is properly cited.Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery for patients with ERM and glaucoma. Methods. We reviewed the medical records of 20 consecutive ERM patients with glaucoma, who underwent 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery (27GMIVS) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. e preoperative and 6-month postoperative visual field was tested with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24-2 program. Changes in threshold sensitivity in the HFA test points were analyzed po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The visual acuity and VF sensitivity of our patients were relatively poorer, with a mean (±SD) visual acuity (logMAR) and MD (dB) of 0.68 ± 0.30 and 210.19 ± 7.13, respectively, compared with 0.16 ± 0.16 and 28.4 ± 5.7 in Tsuchiya's study and 0.29 and 28.7 in Yoshida's study. 6,21 Interestingly, the group with preserved or improved visual acuity in our study had a mean MD of 26.64 ± 3.92, similar to the above studies. Figure 2 clearly shows that eyes with advanced VF defects more than 212 dB have a much higher risk of unfavorable visual outcomes after vitrectomy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The visual acuity and VF sensitivity of our patients were relatively poorer, with a mean (±SD) visual acuity (logMAR) and MD (dB) of 0.68 ± 0.30 and 210.19 ± 7.13, respectively, compared with 0.16 ± 0.16 and 28.4 ± 5.7 in Tsuchiya's study and 0.29 and 28.7 in Yoshida's study. 6,21 Interestingly, the group with preserved or improved visual acuity in our study had a mean MD of 26.64 ± 3.92, similar to the above studies. Figure 2 clearly shows that eyes with advanced VF defects more than 212 dB have a much higher risk of unfavorable visual outcomes after vitrectomy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The epiretinal membrane (ERM) is a thin layer of fibrous tissue forming on the inner surface of the central retina. It causes metamorphopsia, monocular diplopia, and vision loss [1]. The exact etiology of this condition remains unknown, but it can be idiopathic or secondary to other ocular diseases, trauma, or previous intraocular operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transient changes in temporal nerve fiber layer thickness do not affect VA, 59 and visual fields do not deteriorate after vitrectomy for ERM with ILM peeling. 60 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transient changes in temporal nerve fiber layer thickness do not affect VA, 59 and visual fields do not deteriorate after vitrectomy for ERM with ILM peeling. 60 An important limitation, concerns the fact that there are only few studies with histopathologic analysis for determining the extent of simultaneous ILM peel during ERM peeling. Also, it is unclear whether surgeons checked for positive ILM staining after the ERM removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%