2001
DOI: 10.13031/2013.6102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy Evaluati on of a New Spray?recovery Sprayer for Orchards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is generally accepted that crop-pesticide application by spraying is an inefficient process (Salyani, Farooq, & Sweeb, 2007) and the quantity of the chemical that reaches the target is significantly less than that released from sprayer. Several studies (Balsari & Marucco, 2009;Panneton, Theriault, & Lacasse, 2001) have estimated that the amount of pesticide deposited on the target is not more than 55% of the volume sprayed and that the other 45% goes to the ground (w25%) or is lost as small airborne droplets (w20%). Any pesticide which is released from a sprayer but does not eventually have the desired biological effect on the target, can induce off-target pesticide resistance, increase costs for the grower, and increase chemical contamination in the environment (De Moor, Vereeckle, Jaeken, Lootens, & Vandecasteele, 2000;Giles & Downey, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is generally accepted that crop-pesticide application by spraying is an inefficient process (Salyani, Farooq, & Sweeb, 2007) and the quantity of the chemical that reaches the target is significantly less than that released from sprayer. Several studies (Balsari & Marucco, 2009;Panneton, Theriault, & Lacasse, 2001) have estimated that the amount of pesticide deposited on the target is not more than 55% of the volume sprayed and that the other 45% goes to the ground (w25%) or is lost as small airborne droplets (w20%). Any pesticide which is released from a sprayer but does not eventually have the desired biological effect on the target, can induce off-target pesticide resistance, increase costs for the grower, and increase chemical contamination in the environment (De Moor, Vereeckle, Jaeken, Lootens, & Vandecasteele, 2000;Giles & Downey, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uprkos kritikama upotrebe hemijskih sredstava za zaštitu bilja, farmer će nastaviti upotrebu i aplikaciju prskalicama (Panneton, et al 2001;2005;2007). Ako nije moguće uticati u tolikoj meri na upotrebu hemijskih sredstava, može se povećati efikasnost aplikacije.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…The amount and the distribution of the pesticides on the tree crown varies depending on the characteristics of the air jet (Khot et al, 2012). The air volume flow rate of the orchard sprayer and penetration of the air flow must be set to be sufficient to different tree crowns (Panneton et al 2001, Delele et al 2005, Garcia et al 2012. Beside this, the airflow need of orchard depends on the crown geometry of the tree, tractor velocity, vegetative development of the tree, foliage density, wind velocity (Chen et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%