2016
DOI: 10.2147/ott.s110926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and toxicities of adding molecular targeted agents to first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicities of adding molecular targeted agents (MTAs) to first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).MethodsAn extensive search for relevant clinical trials was conducted in electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane) and abstracts presented at meetings. Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapies with or without MTAs in advanced BTC were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been an interest in identification of potential targets in combination with a precision medicine approach for patients with BTC [ 5 ]. Unfortunately, none of the studies completed to date have improved the current standard of care [ 6 , 7 ]. Results from studies targeting Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) [ 8 , 9 , 10 ] and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) [ 11 ] (predominantly in intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)) show promise and are expected to change the treatment paradigm for patients with ICC, although final results of ongoing studies are awaited for confirmation of real benefit (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been an interest in identification of potential targets in combination with a precision medicine approach for patients with BTC [ 5 ]. Unfortunately, none of the studies completed to date have improved the current standard of care [ 6 , 7 ]. Results from studies targeting Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) [ 8 , 9 , 10 ] and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) [ 11 ] (predominantly in intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)) show promise and are expected to change the treatment paradigm for patients with ICC, although final results of ongoing studies are awaited for confirmation of real benefit (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of safety, toxicity has been reported including: neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, skin rash, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, anemia, peripheral neuropathy, AST/ALT elevation, etc. Among them, only neutropenia [14] (RR=1.95,95%CI 1.13-1.36), rash [14] (RR=18.11, 95%CI 5.13-63.91) and diarrhea [23] (RR=2.48,95%CI 1.2-5.10) were higher in the experimental group than in the control group. However, the risk of neutropenia and diarrhea has been inconsistent in different meta-analyses, For example, neutropenia reported by Xin ZHUANG [13] (RR=1.37,95%CI 0.89-2.21) and diarrhea reported by ALESSANDRO RIZZO [14] (RR=1.65,95%CI 0.89-3.04) showed no difference in risk between the two groups.…”
Section: Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Four studies investigated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy + targeted therapy versus gemcitabine-based chemotherapy alone [13,14,22,23] (Table 2). Targeted therapies are typically epidermal growth factor receptor or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (anti-EGFR/VEGFR).…”
Section: Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modest or even absent significant clinical activity was noted at the cost of relevant toxicities (97)(98)(99). In a meta-analysis of 6 trials involving 855 patients treated either with erlotinib, cetuximab, panitumumab, cediranib or sorafenib, no OS advantage was observed in the experimental arms despite enhanced or a trend for enhanced RR and PFS (100). As second-line agents, in a very small retrospective analysis of 13 patients refractory to GEMOX, FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab achieved a RR of 41% with a median PFS and OS of 7.6 and 14.2 months, respectively (101).…”
Section: Targeted Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%