2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04508-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety profile of intravenous tocilizumab versus intravenous abatacept in treating female Saudi Arabian patients with active moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three papers were identified reporting BP data with IL-6 antagonist tocilizumab, two used in combination with methotrexate. 172,173 SBP increase was demonstrated by Elmedany et al…”
Section: Anti-il-17mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Three papers were identified reporting BP data with IL-6 antagonist tocilizumab, two used in combination with methotrexate. 172,173 SBP increase was demonstrated by Elmedany et al…”
Section: Anti-il-17mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…(116±16 vs 129 + /-17 mmHg, p=0.001), 172 the other two papers reporting no change in BP with IL6 blockade 173,174 , though the average baseline BP values were normal range. Overall, the minimally available evidence (detailed in Supplementary Table ) does not support an association with BP lowering.…”
Section: Anti-il-17mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…52 58-60 106 121 When directly comparing different non-TNFi bDMARDs, there was a numerical advantage of tocilizumab to be more effective than abatacept in patients who failed a TNFi in six of seven papers (statistically significant in at least one of the response criteria in 3 papers (1 SLR (of 4 studies), 1 RCT, 5 observational studies; 1 moderate RoB, 6 high RoB)). 63 83 84 89 91 97 101Additionally, there was a numerical advantage of tocilizumab to be more effective than abatacept in patients who failed rituximab in three of three papers (statistically significant in at least one of the response criteria in 2 papers (3 observational studies; 3 high RoB)). 62 114 117 Furthermore, there was some advantage of tocilizumab to be more effective than rituximab in patients who failed a TNFi (4 papers) or a non-TNFi (1 paper) in five of five papers (statistically significant in at least one of the response criteria in all papers (2 SLRs (of 24 and 4 studies (partly overlapping)), 1 RCT, 2 observational studies; 2 moderate RoB, 3 high RoB)).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, according to this scenario, anti-inflammatory drugs should be given before the presentation of Stage II symptoms (Sheppard et al, 2017). To this end, however, tocilizumab and corticosteroids are questioned, or not recommended in earlier stages because of the cost and sub-optimal safety issues (Elmedany et al, 2019), and because of immunosuppressive activity (Veronese et al, 2020), respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%