2023
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1229223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of visually guided laser balloon versus cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wenyi Ye,
Qian Chen,
Guangci Fan
et al.

Abstract: BackgroundNewly developed catheter ablation (CA) techniques, such as laser balloon ablation (LBA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA), have been introduced in recent years and emerged as valuable alternatives to conventional radiofrequency CA strategies for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients. However, evidence comparing LBA and CBA remain controversial. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety between these two techniques.MethodsScientific databases (PubMed, Embase) and rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to RF and cryoenergy, lasers represent another energy source feasible for AF ablation. Three generations of laser balloon ablation systems have been developed (namely HeartLight, HeartLight Excalibur, and HeartLight X3 by CardioFocus, Marlborough, MA, USA) and several studies have demonstrated the non-inferiority of lasers compared to RF or cryoablation systems in terms of safety and efficacy, with a success rate ranging from 61.7% to 82.3% [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to RF and cryoenergy, lasers represent another energy source feasible for AF ablation. Three generations of laser balloon ablation systems have been developed (namely HeartLight, HeartLight Excalibur, and HeartLight X3 by CardioFocus, Marlborough, MA, USA) and several studies have demonstrated the non-inferiority of lasers compared to RF or cryoablation systems in terms of safety and efficacy, with a success rate ranging from 61.7% to 82.3% [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%