2017
DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Vinorelbine-Capecitabine Oral Metronomic Combination in Elderly Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: VICTOR-1 Study

Abstract: The all-oral metronomic combination of vinorelbine and capecitabine had an acceptable efficacy profile and appears to be better tolerated than standard treatment schedules in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients (age ≥70 years).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta‐analysis [26] including all metronomic regimens for advanced breast cancer and prostate cancer showed that the mean ORR of mCHT was 26.0% and the median PFS was 4.6 months. Studies of other metronomic regimens with or without targeted therapy have reported the ORR of 18%‐62% and PFS ranging from 4.3 to 10.8 months [16, 17, 27‐29]. No clinical trials have compared the efficacy among these regimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A meta‐analysis [26] including all metronomic regimens for advanced breast cancer and prostate cancer showed that the mean ORR of mCHT was 26.0% and the median PFS was 4.6 months. Studies of other metronomic regimens with or without targeted therapy have reported the ORR of 18%‐62% and PFS ranging from 4.3 to 10.8 months [16, 17, 27‐29]. No clinical trials have compared the efficacy among these regimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since many trials in metastatic setting have shown mCHT as a well‐tolerated treatment strategy, the expert panel in the “Metronomic chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer” study group agreed that mCHT can be a treatment option for metastatic disease in selected patients [6]. Vinorelbine, capecitabine, CTX, and MTX are most commonly used agents in clinical practice, and their metronomic dosages have been assessed in several studies [16‐19]. Further, it is easy to modify their dosages when adverse events occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Elderly patients: These patients may represent the strongest indication for MCT, with the mild toxicity profile, QOL benefits, and convenience/acceptability of oral MCT regimens offering particular advantages in elderly individuals. This is supported by several positive studies of vinorelbine-based MCT in older patients with advanced breast cancer [22,25,26].…”
Section: Patient Selection For Mctmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Efficacy data were promising, with a CBR of 58.1% (n = 18/31). In a sub-analysis of 18 elderly subjects (aged ≥ 70 years) in VICTOR-1, the CBR was even higher (67%), albeit in a small group of patients [26]. VICTOR-2 was a larger, multicenter, Phase 2 study based on the recommended doses of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine established in VICTOR-1 [25].…”
Section: Article Highlightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings have been reported in other studies. In a sub-analysis of 18 elderly patients enrolled in the VICTOR-1 study, median time to progression (TTP) was 10.5 months (range 1–40 months), with an objective response rate (ORR) of 33% and a clinical benefit rate of 67% 32. In the VICTOR-2 study, median TTP was 6.5 months in 28 patients with triple-negative breast cancer and 8.3 months in those with HR+ disease (n=52) 33.…”
Section: Statements and Supporting Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%