2010
DOI: 10.1007/s13312-010-0095-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of therapeutic nutrition products for home based therapeutic nutrition for severe acute malnutrition: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This fi nding is also supported by a systematic review that demonstrated the effi cacy and effectiveness of peanutbased RUTF in the management of SAM among children. 9 It is thus logical to believe that if we improved aspects that currently hinder its acceptability, there would be a positive effect on the overall perceived 'value' of PPN among benefi ciaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This fi nding is also supported by a systematic review that demonstrated the effi cacy and effectiveness of peanutbased RUTF in the management of SAM among children. 9 It is thus logical to believe that if we improved aspects that currently hinder its acceptability, there would be a positive effect on the overall perceived 'value' of PPN among benefi ciaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 121 (81%) children had SAM and 28 (19%) had MAM. Nearly 51% of the included children had received PPN for 3 weeks and the remainder had received it for >3 weeks (range [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some have focused on comparing the inpatient model with the community model (Lenters et al, 2013;Schooness et al, 2013;Ashworth, 2006); some have assessed the appropriateness and efficacy of routine first-line antibiotics provided during outpatient care for children with uncomplicated SAM (Alcoba et al, 2013); and others have examined the effect of different ready-to-use foods (RUFs), including cost-effectiveness (Bhutta et al, 2008;Gera, 2010). Picot and colleagues (2012) reviewed various intervention studies that have been designed to treat infants and children aged under five years with SAM.…”
Section: Rationale and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not conduct a meta-analysis of included homogenous studies, since previous reviews (Gera, 2010;Schooness et al, 2013;Lenters et al, 2013) have already done this. Instead, a narrative synthesis of the data was performed, with a tabulation of the results.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Evidence Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%