2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3911826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of the CVnCoV SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Candidate: Results from Herald, a Phase 2b/3, Randomised, Observer-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial in Ten Countries in Europe and Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, there appeared to be significant variability in antibody responses to 12 μg CVnCoV, though the sample size was small. Cure-Vac has started a phase IIb/III randomized placebo-controlled blinded safety and efficacy trial (NCT04652102) with 39,680 participants (vaccine and placebo groups in a 1:1 ratio) in ten countries using two immunizations 28 days apart with the 12 μg dose (13). Primary efficacy analysis included symptomatic COVID-19 more than 14 days after administration of the second dose.…”
Section: Curevac Vaccinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, there appeared to be significant variability in antibody responses to 12 μg CVnCoV, though the sample size was small. Cure-Vac has started a phase IIb/III randomized placebo-controlled blinded safety and efficacy trial (NCT04652102) with 39,680 participants (vaccine and placebo groups in a 1:1 ratio) in ten countries using two immunizations 28 days apart with the 12 μg dose (13). Primary efficacy analysis included symptomatic COVID-19 more than 14 days after administration of the second dose.…”
Section: Curevac Vaccinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the unmodified COVID-19 mRNA vaccine candidate in late-stage clinical trials (CVnCoV, developed by Curevac) had a maximum dose of 12 µg. However, the recent CVnCoV vaccine clinical trial results showed only 48% of efficacy against any severity of the disease, ( Kremsner et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Modified Vs Unmodified Covid-19 Mrna Vaccines Lead To Different Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, another COVID-19 mRNA vaccine candidate (developed by Curevac NV), which is based on an unmodified (Ψ-lacking) mRNA encoding the same COVID-19 spike protein and uses the same LNPs as the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine does ( Buschmann et al, 2021 ), failed to meet expectations ( Baker and Dolgin, 2021 ). The clinical trial test results ultimately revealed only 48% of efficacy against symptomatic disease ( Kremsner et al, 2021 ) for the unmodified mRNA vaccine, suggesting that modified Ψ and use of LNP technology were both critical success factors for platform validation of mRNA ( Dolgin, 2021a ). In this mini-review, we will emphasize the main features of this RNA modification and a chemically evolved version of it that contribute to the success of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and the control of the pandemic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clinical data were not as good as expected. Results of their 40,000-participant clinical trial (NCT04652102) unexpectedly resulted in only 47% efficacy, as opposed to over 90% efficacy reported by the approved vaccines [136]. Several hypotheses have been described, such as the presence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants in the countries in which the study was held.…”
Section: Additional Covid-19 Vaccines Based On Mrna and Delivery Vehi...mentioning
confidence: 99%