2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2393-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of the novel α4β2 neuronal nicotinic receptor partial agonist ABT-089 in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study

Abstract: In this phase 2 crossover study, the NNR partial agonist ABT-089, at doses of 40 mg QD and 40 mg BID, was efficacious and generally well tolerated in treatment of adults with ADHD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These included ABT-089, a partial agonist Sullivan et al, 1997;Anderson et al, 2009;Marks et al, 2009;Apostol et al, 2012), as well as a full agonist ABT-894 (Ji et al, 2007;Rowbotham et al, 2012;Bain et al, 2013). ABT-089 maximally decreased LIDs by 40% whereas ABT-894 reduced LIDs up to 60% in nonhuman primates (Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included ABT-089, a partial agonist Sullivan et al, 1997;Anderson et al, 2009;Marks et al, 2009;Apostol et al, 2012), as well as a full agonist ABT-894 (Ji et al, 2007;Rowbotham et al, 2012;Bain et al, 2013). ABT-089 maximally decreased LIDs by 40% whereas ABT-894 reduced LIDs up to 60% in nonhuman primates (Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Nicotinic receptor compounds, such as the neuronal nicotinic receptor partial agonist ABT-089 (in clinical trials in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder), have also been generally well tolerated, with a similar AE profile to that of dexmecamylamine. 10 Study completion rates were relatively high for a long-term trial (~40% at week 52), whereas discontinuation rates due to AEs (~10%) were low, indicating that the study was methodologically sound and that results were representative of the overall randomized patient population. Moreover, patient demographics were concordant with those seen in other clinical trials conducted in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This exploratory, dose-finding, multicenter study utilized a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover design (Apostol et al, 2012). The crossover design was employed to achieve study objectives while minimizing the numbers of patients required for this exploratory study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Completers were defined as those subjects who completed both Periods 1 and 2, and whose last CAARS:Inv evaluation within each period was performed no more than one day after the last dose of study drug in the period. The approved clinical protocol and statistical analysis plan prespecified that efficacy evaluation was made on the basis of one-sided tests at a ¼ 0.05 comparing each ABT-894 dose group with placebo at day 28 (Apostol et al, 2012;Wilens et al, 2006Wilens et al, , 2011. To facilitate comparisons with the published literature, post hoc analyses using two-sided tests for each dose group vs placebo were conducted for all efficacy variables and are included in the Results section and published online Supplementary Materials.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%