2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in Steroid-Refractory/Dependent Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: Real-World Data and Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The REACH studies also investigated patients with late stage and severe disease (64% stage III–IV aGvHD; 57% had severe cGvHD) [ 14 , 15 ] but the inclusion of pediatric patients (from 2 years old) and the number of patients treated in this CU program, and in other ruxolitinib real-world studies [ 29 31 ] have greatly expanded the ruxolitinib-treated population beyond the REACH trial populations ( ≥ 12 years old) [ 14 , 15 ]. Consistent with other CU programs [ 28 30 , 32 ] many patients in this study had received multiple lines of therapy and concomitant medications, which highlights the complexity of their disease. Interestingly, ruxolitinib was considered predominantly as a second- or third-line treatment option, which suggests that physicians’ have confidence in the efficacy of ruxolitinib versus investigators’ choice of treatment as demonstrated in patients with steroid-refractory aGvHD and cGvHD in the REACH studies, and its safety in vulnerable patients [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The REACH studies also investigated patients with late stage and severe disease (64% stage III–IV aGvHD; 57% had severe cGvHD) [ 14 , 15 ] but the inclusion of pediatric patients (from 2 years old) and the number of patients treated in this CU program, and in other ruxolitinib real-world studies [ 29 31 ] have greatly expanded the ruxolitinib-treated population beyond the REACH trial populations ( ≥ 12 years old) [ 14 , 15 ]. Consistent with other CU programs [ 28 30 , 32 ] many patients in this study had received multiple lines of therapy and concomitant medications, which highlights the complexity of their disease. Interestingly, ruxolitinib was considered predominantly as a second- or third-line treatment option, which suggests that physicians’ have confidence in the efficacy of ruxolitinib versus investigators’ choice of treatment as demonstrated in patients with steroid-refractory aGvHD and cGvHD in the REACH studies, and its safety in vulnerable patients [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Organ responses and results of other prospective and retrospective studies on the use of ruxolitinib for SR acute and cGvHD are shown in Table 1a [15,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Jak-inhibition In Chronic Gvhdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This survival outcome can be compared with the 82% 2-year OS in a recently reported phase 2, rho-associated coiled-coil–containing protein kinase-2 inhibitor trial, 21 71% 2-year OS in the follow-up study of ibrutinib, 20 76% 2-year OS in a real-world experience of ibrutinib, 25 approximately 73% 2-year OS in the phase 3 ruxolitinib study, 23 and 77% and 83% in reports of real-world experience with ruxolitinib. 26, 27 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%