Aims The aim of this study was to compare the effect pro®les of i.v. administered rilmenidine aimed at the same target plasma concentration, but attained with different rates. Methods The study was placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, doubledummy, three-way, cross-over in nine healthy volunteers. All subjects randomly received either a fast infusion, a slow infusion or a placebo infusion. The target concentration was set at 8 ng ml x1 with a ®vefold difference in the time to reach the maximum concentration. Saccadic eye movements, electroencephalography (EEG), blood pressure and heart rate were measured every half hour. Drug plasma concentrations, adverse events, salivary¯ow and visual analogue scales were obtained every hour.Results Changes in systolic/diastolic blood pressure at the end of the infusion were (mean t s.d.) 13.3t16.4/7.9t7.5 mmHg with the fast infusion and 16.3t12.7/10.2t7.9 mmHg during the slow infusion, compared with 0.0t13.2/ 1.3t8.3 mmHg for the placebo occasion. Decrease of saccadic peak velocity (SPV) at the end of the infusion was 18.0t5.2% during the fast infusion, 23.0t7.0% with the slow infusion, and 6.1t5.2% with placebo. PK/PD analysis showed similar concentration-dependent linear reduction in SPV and blood pressure up to the maximum observed rilmenidine plasma level for both the fast and the slow infusion. Conclusions The rate of infusion of rilmenidine in healthy volunteers does not in¯uence the PK/PD relationship of saccadic eye movements and blood pressure up to the maximum observed rilmenidine plasma concentrations. Rilmenidine causes clear concentration-dependent blood pressure reductions in healthy volunteers.