2020
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in Previously Treated Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results From the Phase II KEYNOTE-158 Study

Abstract: Purpose: KEYNOTE-158 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02628067) investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab across multiple cancers. We present results from patients with previously treated advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET).Patients and Methods: Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered every 3 weeks for 2 years or until progression, intolerable toxicity, or physician/patient decision. Tumor imaging was performed every 9 weeks for the first year and then every 12 weeks. Endpoints… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
107
3
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(36 reference statements)
7
107
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This also suggests an important role for immune modulation in GEP-NENs and DNA methylation might be a mechanism to regulate the gene expression of these proteins. Multiple studies evaluating immunotherapy in well-differentiated GEP-NENs are ongoing, but so far, observed response rates have been low [45,46]. Possible explanations are the cold immune microenvironment, i.e., the lack of immune cells, which might be caused by the described immune modulation in GEP-NENs resulting in immune evasion, and the low tumor mutational burden in GEP-NENs, as a high tumor mutational burden has been shown to associate with an increased benefit of immunotherapy [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also suggests an important role for immune modulation in GEP-NENs and DNA methylation might be a mechanism to regulate the gene expression of these proteins. Multiple studies evaluating immunotherapy in well-differentiated GEP-NENs are ongoing, but so far, observed response rates have been low [45,46]. Possible explanations are the cold immune microenvironment, i.e., the lack of immune cells, which might be caused by the described immune modulation in GEP-NENs resulting in immune evasion, and the low tumor mutational burden in GEP-NENs, as a high tumor mutational burden has been shown to associate with an increased benefit of immunotherapy [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High rate of mutations could result in the formation of neoantigens, which is hypothesized to enhance the anti-tumor immune response [ 37 ]. In NETs, both the anti-PD1 agents pembrolizumab and spartalizumab have proven to be safe, but the results are unsatisfactory in terms of activity [ 38 , 39 ]. We observed low somatic coding mutation per case for both NETs, but also higher mutation load (≥6 somatic mutations) for two TCs and four ACs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors in patients with PanNETs has led to disappointing results (Table S5). Pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody, has been explored in well-differentiated NEN population first in a phase Ib study (KEYNOTE -028 [49]; 16 patients with PanNETs included) followed by a phase II clinical trial (KEYNOTE-158 [48]; number of patients with PanNETs not specified). Reported median PFS was short (4.5 months in PanNETs) [49] and observed responses were low (6% in PanNETs) [49].…”
Section: Evidence Supporting the Use Of Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%