2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec in children with spinal muscular atrophy type 1: real-world evidence from 6 infusion centres in the United Kingdom

Vasantha Gowda,
Mark Atherton,
Archana Murugan
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a paucity of data on safety and efficacy outcomes of onasemnogene abeparvovec when administered to patients older than 2 years of age. Real-world evidence of 21 patients aged ≥2 years at onasemnogene abeparvovec infusion reported an estimated 3.8-point gain in CHOP-INTEND scores after gene therapy (follow-up duration not reported) ( 25 ). A separate study ( 22 ) reported an increase of 5.1 points in mean CHOP-INTEND scores from baseline to 12 months (47.1 vs. 52.2 points, respectively) in 19 SMA type 1 patients with ≥2 SMN2 copies aged >2 years at onasemnogene abeparvovec treatment, which is similar to the 7.7-point increase reported here (46.0 vs. 53.7 points from baseline to 12 months, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a paucity of data on safety and efficacy outcomes of onasemnogene abeparvovec when administered to patients older than 2 years of age. Real-world evidence of 21 patients aged ≥2 years at onasemnogene abeparvovec infusion reported an estimated 3.8-point gain in CHOP-INTEND scores after gene therapy (follow-up duration not reported) ( 25 ). A separate study ( 22 ) reported an increase of 5.1 points in mean CHOP-INTEND scores from baseline to 12 months (47.1 vs. 52.2 points, respectively) in 19 SMA type 1 patients with ≥2 SMN2 copies aged >2 years at onasemnogene abeparvovec treatment, which is similar to the 7.7-point increase reported here (46.0 vs. 53.7 points from baseline to 12 months, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of The Lancet Regional Health–Europe , Gowda and colleagues now report on the treatment results of the nationwide use of OA in the UK in patients older than 2 years and with body weights over 13.5 kg. 7 The data was collected as part of an observational study conducted at all centers authorized to treat SMA in the UK. Ninety-nine SMA (45 of which were treatment-naïve) were treated with OA (median age at treatment: 10 [range, 0.6–89] months; median weight: 7.86 [range, 3.2–20.2] kg; duration of follow-up: 3–22 months).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%