2013
DOI: 10.1002/acr.22035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Nonbiologic Immunosuppressants in the Treatment of Nonrenal Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Objective. To analyze the efficacy and safety of nonbiologic immunosuppressants in the treatment of nonrenal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods. We conducted a sensitive literature search in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to October 2011. The selection criteria were studies including adult patients with SLE, a treatment intervention with nonbiologic immunosuppressants, a placebo or active comparator group, and outcome measures assessing efficacy and/or safety… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we could confirm an excellent response of this condition to MMF and belimumab, as previously published [17,18]. Additionally, we observed good response of joint pain to MMF in accordance with published data [23]. On the contrary, we could not confirm efficacy of a combination consisting of MMF, HCQ and belimumab in skin lesions, as published previously [18,19,24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, we could confirm an excellent response of this condition to MMF and belimumab, as previously published [17,18]. Additionally, we observed good response of joint pain to MMF in accordance with published data [23]. On the contrary, we could not confirm efficacy of a combination consisting of MMF, HCQ and belimumab in skin lesions, as published previously [18,19,24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is an area that has recently been reviewed elsewhere, and only trials from 2005 onwards have been discussed here 104 . Many of these trials are small, the patients are heterogeneous, and the outcome measures are highly variable and often not validated in clinical trial research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCQ, for instance, can result in time-and dose-dependent retinal toxicity and visual loss [27]; CYC can induce hemorrhagic cystitis, ovarian failure, malignancy, and infections [20,22]; prolonged or high-dose GC therapy is associated with multiple side effects including weight gain, osteoporosis, hypertension, glucose intolerance, immunosuppression, myopathy, delayed wound healing, and behavioral changes [28,29]. On the one hand, the use of these medications, allied with better diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, led to an increase in the 5-year survival rate of SLE patients from about 50-70 % in the 1950s to over 90 % in the 1990s and later [7,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLE which does not respond to the initial treatment, or which is controlled only by the prolonged administration of GCs in unacceptably high doses, may be treated with immunosuppressive (IS) agents such as methotrexate (MTX), azathioprine (AZA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) [20,21]. SLE with neuropsychiatric manifestations may respond to intravenous (IV) infusions of cyclophosphamide (CYC) [21,22]. Severe lupus nephritis (LN) has been traditionally managed with a combination of GCs and high-dose CYC (six monthly IV pulses of 0.5-1.0 mg/m 2 of body surface area [BSA] for remission induction, followed by quarterly IV CYC as the maintenance therapy, i.e., the BNIH regimen^) [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation