Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status.

Abstract

e21601 Background: The introduction of Immunotherapy (IO) has dramatically improved the prognosis of patients (pts) with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). However, data regarding the role of IO in ECOG Performance Status (PS) 2 pts are generally limited in randomized trials, and real-world evidences could support clinical decision-making. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data about pts with stage IV NSCLC treated with IO between April 2013 and December 2019 in two Italian Centers. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of PS status (0-1 vs 2) on disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Response was classified according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Chi-square test was used to compare clinical-pathological variables: gender, age ( < 70, 70-79, ≥80 years-old), smoking status, histology (squamous, non-squamous), PDL1 expression ( < 1%, ≥1%), IO line (1°, ≥2°), number (N) of metastatic sites (1, ≥2), presence of liver and/or brain metastasis. Their impact on survival was evaluated through Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Four-hundred-one pts (35.7% female) with median age of 65.4 years (range 27-88) were studied. Baseline PS was 0 in 134 pts (33.4%), 1 in 209 pts (52.1%) and 2 in 58 pts (14.5%). 312 pts had non-squamous NSCLC, 89 squamous NSCLC. Clinical-pathological variables were uniformly distributed across PS groups except for a higher rate of liver metastasis in PS2 pts ( p= 0.046). Response evaluation was available for 386 pts. DCR was 49.7% in PS0-1 pts and 25.9% in PS2 pts ( p= 0.006). At a median follow-up of 29 months (mos), median PFS was 3.0 mos (95% CI 2.63-4.00) and 2.04 mos (95% CI 1.84-3.00) in pts with PS0-1 and 2 ( p< 0.0001). Median OS was 13.2 mos (95% CI 11.18-15.78) and 4.0 mos (95% CI 2.66-5.62) in pts with PS 0-1 and 2 respectively ( p< 0.0001). Univariate analysis showed significant correlation of PS2 status, negative PDL1, IO line ≥2, N of metastatic sites ≥2 and liver metastasis, for both PFS and OS. Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent association of PS ( p= 0.0013 for PFS, p< 0.0001 for OS), PDL1 ( p= 0.0002 for PFS, p= 0.02 for OS) and liver metastasis ( p= 0.017 for PFS, p= 0.02 for OS). The incidence of Grade 3/4 adverse events was 10.5% in PS 0-1 pts and 13.7% in PS 2 pts ( p= 0.41). Conclusions: Our data confirm reduced efficacy of IO in pts with poor PS, regardless of the N of prior therapy lines or PDL1 expression. Despite IO appears to be safe and tolerable its role remains uncertain in PS2 pts based on worse survival outcomes.

Translational Insights and New Therapeutic Perspectives in Head and Neck Tumors

“…However, despite promising treatment results, a significant number of patients still fail to achieve clinically meaningful benefits. For this reason, in the era of precision medicine, identifying reliable predictive factors to select patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment with immune agents is a crucial and open challenge in oncology [18].…”