2014
DOI: 10.1111/cen.12477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of growth hormone treatment in adults with growth hormone deficiency: a systematic review of studies on morbidity

Abstract: SummaryDue to the positive effects demonstrated in randomized clinical trials on cardiovascular surrogate markers and bone metabolism, a positive effect of growth hormone (GH) treatment on clinically relevant end-points seems feasible. In this review, we discuss the long-term efficacy and safety of GH treatment in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) with emphasis on morbidity: fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke, fractures, fatal and nonfatal malignancies and recurrences,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(207 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, the occurrence of secondary intracranial tumors did not differ between irradiated and nonirradiated NFPA patients (1.1 vs 0.6%), but the risk of cerebrovascular events was increased in irradiated men (31). Overall, as discussed in a recent review, fatal and nonfatal malignancies do not appear to be more prevalent in GHtreated adults compared to the general population, and also not in previously irradiated patients (11,18). Nevertheless, potential side effects of pituitary irradiation should be carefully balanced against benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study, the occurrence of secondary intracranial tumors did not differ between irradiated and nonirradiated NFPA patients (1.1 vs 0.6%), but the risk of cerebrovascular events was increased in irradiated men (31). Overall, as discussed in a recent review, fatal and nonfatal malignancies do not appear to be more prevalent in GHtreated adults compared to the general population, and also not in previously irradiated patients (11,18). Nevertheless, potential side effects of pituitary irradiation should be carefully balanced against benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, several aspects that may widely vary between studies, such as treatment-related factors (eg, surgical technique, extent of surgery, radiotherapy), study population, tumor characteristics, and follow-up duration have to be taken into account when comparing different studies. So far, only a few studies in the literature have explored the possible effect of GH-RT on tumor progression in NFPA patients specifically (11,17,19,20). Buchfelder et al (20) compared operated NFPA patients who were either treated with GH-RT or not in a retrospective case-control study of 55 matched pairs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 12 people were found to have been diagnosed with diabetes after cessation of GH treatment (≥17 years). There is evidence that adults with untreated GH deficiency can develop reduced insulin sensitivity as a result of an increase in abdominal fat; however, GH treatment may also increase the risk of developing diabetes as GH can cause insulin resistance .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rates of general population, standardized by country, gender, and age [30]. Bunderen et al played a review to discuss the long-term efficacy and safety of GH treatment in AGHD patients with emphasis on morbidity [31]. In a subgroup of the review, the risk of regrowth and recurrences of pituitary tumors were not increasing in AGHD patients treated with GH compared with untreated AGHD patients, while secondary brain tumors remained more prevalent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%