Efficacy and Safety of Fibroblast Growth Factor‐21 Analogs for the Treatment of Metabolic Dysfunction‐Associated Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Abstract

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)‐21 analogs are potential therapeutic candidates for metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitis (MASH). This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the FGF‐21 analogs, efruxifermin, pegbelfermin, and pegozafermin for MASH treatment. A comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials from five major databases was conducted. Primary efficacy outcomes focused on liver histological improvement, while secondary efficacy outcomes encompassed reductions in liver fat content and improvements in biochemical parameters. Safety outcomes examined included treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment‐related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and serious TEAEs. Eight eligible studies involving 963 patients were included in this review. Compared with the placebo group, the FGF‐21 analog‐treated group exhibited significantly improved primary efficacy outcomes, specifically ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of MASH (risk ratio [RR] = 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27–2.62) and at least two‐point improvement in the non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score with no worsening of fibrosis (RR = 2.85; 95% CI = 2.06–3.95). Despite an increased risk of TEAEs (RR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.08–1.27) and treatment‐related adverse events (RR = 1.75; 95% CI = 1.40–2.19), FGF‐21 analogs exhibited an acceptable safety profile. FGF‐21 analogs were significantly better in achieving liver histological improvements and beneficial biochemical outcomes compared with placebo, with a tolerable safety pattern. These findings shed light on the efficacy and safety of FGF‐21 analogs and provide valuable evidence for their application as MASH therapeutics.