2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (Doacs) in Morbidly Obese Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one of the included studies, the AUC value following a 10 mg rivaroxaban dose was 1155 µg.h.L −1 [31], which is higher than the reported values in a range of 864-1029 µg.h.L −1 in the general population [31,71,78]. This comes in agreement with guideline recommendations that endorse that rivaroxaban could produce the desired exposure in obese subjects and thus could be prescribed without dose adjustment [41,86]. A CL value of 7.86 L.h −1 and a V d value of 73.4-82.8 L in the obese population [31,77] were interestingly falling in the middle of the range of values reported in the general population (CL ranged from 5.57 to 11.3 L.h −1 and V d ranged from 59.4 to 104 L) [30,70,71,73], and thus the same trend was also calculated for t ½ (using the formula:…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In one of the included studies, the AUC value following a 10 mg rivaroxaban dose was 1155 µg.h.L −1 [31], which is higher than the reported values in a range of 864-1029 µg.h.L −1 in the general population [31,71,78]. This comes in agreement with guideline recommendations that endorse that rivaroxaban could produce the desired exposure in obese subjects and thus could be prescribed without dose adjustment [41,86]. A CL value of 7.86 L.h −1 and a V d value of 73.4-82.8 L in the obese population [31,77] were interestingly falling in the middle of the range of values reported in the general population (CL ranged from 5.57 to 11.3 L.h −1 and V d ranged from 59.4 to 104 L) [30,70,71,73], and thus the same trend was also calculated for t ½ (using the formula:…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%