Abstract:PurposeNeoadjuvant CT-P6, a trastuzumab biosimilar, demonstrated equivalent efficacy to reference trastuzumab in a phase 3 trial of HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC) (NCT02162667). We report post hoc analyses evaluating pathological complete response (pCR) and breast pCR alongside additional efficacy and safety measures.MethodsFollowing neoadjuvant treatment and surgery, patients received adjuvant CT-P6 or trastuzumab (6 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for ≤ 1 year.ResultsIn total, 271 and 278 patients receiv… Show more
“…In the current study, neither CT-P6 nor RTZ showed serious cardiac toxicity pro les. No patients with EBC experienced a reduction in LVEF of < 50% in either treatment group, consistent with the low cardiotoxicity observed in patients with EBC treated with RTZ or CT-P6 in the neoadjuvant [16,21] and adjuvant [17,21] settings. In the current study, 2/38 (5.3%) patients with MBC experienced a decline in LVEF to < 50% with CT-P6, as did 4/65 (6.2%) patients in the RTZ group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…[14,15] Approval was based in part on a phase III clinical trial in patients with operable HER2-positive EBC, which showed comparable safety and equivalent e cacy of CT-P6 and reference trastuzumab (RTZ) when administered in combination with docetaxel and uorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC). [16,17] Data from a 3-year follow-up study have subsequently con rmed that disease-free survival and OS are similar in patients treated with CT-P6 and RTZ. [18] Real-world studies are an important supplement to clinical trials, by revealing the long-term safety and effectiveness of drugs in broader patient populations, as well as in other settings and in combination with other treatments.…”
Background: Here, we present the first real-world comparison of CT-P6 versus reference trastuzumab (RTZ) for the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with HER2-positive EBC, and for the palliative first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with HER2-positive EBC who had received neoadjuvant treatment with RTZ or CT-P6, plus pertuzumab, carboplatin, and docetaxel, followed by surgery, alongside patients with newly diagnosed HER2-positive MBC who had received palliative treatment with RTZ or CT-P6, plus pertuzumab and docetaxel. The primary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR) in the EBC cohort, and progression-free survival (PFS) in the MBC cohort. Results: A similar percentage of patients with EBC achieved a pCR with CT-P6 (74.4% [93/125]) and RTZ (69.8% [90/129]) (p=0.411). For patients with MBC, median PFS did not differ significantly between the two groups (CT-P6: 13.9 months [95% confidence intervals (CIs) not available]; RTZ: 18.4 months [95% CIs 12.5–24.3]; p=0.653). The cardiac safety profiles of CT-P6 and RTZ were similar. Conclusions: These real-world data suggest that CT-P6 has similar effectiveness and cardiac safety to RTZ in patients with HER2-positive EBC and MBC, when administered as part of dual HER2-targeted therapy with pertuzumab plus chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant or palliative setting.
“…In the current study, neither CT-P6 nor RTZ showed serious cardiac toxicity pro les. No patients with EBC experienced a reduction in LVEF of < 50% in either treatment group, consistent with the low cardiotoxicity observed in patients with EBC treated with RTZ or CT-P6 in the neoadjuvant [16,21] and adjuvant [17,21] settings. In the current study, 2/38 (5.3%) patients with MBC experienced a decline in LVEF to < 50% with CT-P6, as did 4/65 (6.2%) patients in the RTZ group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…[14,15] Approval was based in part on a phase III clinical trial in patients with operable HER2-positive EBC, which showed comparable safety and equivalent e cacy of CT-P6 and reference trastuzumab (RTZ) when administered in combination with docetaxel and uorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC). [16,17] Data from a 3-year follow-up study have subsequently con rmed that disease-free survival and OS are similar in patients treated with CT-P6 and RTZ. [18] Real-world studies are an important supplement to clinical trials, by revealing the long-term safety and effectiveness of drugs in broader patient populations, as well as in other settings and in combination with other treatments.…”
Background: Here, we present the first real-world comparison of CT-P6 versus reference trastuzumab (RTZ) for the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with HER2-positive EBC, and for the palliative first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with HER2-positive EBC who had received neoadjuvant treatment with RTZ or CT-P6, plus pertuzumab, carboplatin, and docetaxel, followed by surgery, alongside patients with newly diagnosed HER2-positive MBC who had received palliative treatment with RTZ or CT-P6, plus pertuzumab and docetaxel. The primary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR) in the EBC cohort, and progression-free survival (PFS) in the MBC cohort. Results: A similar percentage of patients with EBC achieved a pCR with CT-P6 (74.4% [93/125]) and RTZ (69.8% [90/129]) (p=0.411). For patients with MBC, median PFS did not differ significantly between the two groups (CT-P6: 13.9 months [95% confidence intervals (CIs) not available]; RTZ: 18.4 months [95% CIs 12.5–24.3]; p=0.653). The cardiac safety profiles of CT-P6 and RTZ were similar. Conclusions: These real-world data suggest that CT-P6 has similar effectiveness and cardiac safety to RTZ in patients with HER2-positive EBC and MBC, when administered as part of dual HER2-targeted therapy with pertuzumab plus chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant or palliative setting.
“…Primary outcome of pathological CR and secondary outcome of ORR were found to be similar, as summarized in Table 1, with no clinically significant difference in toxicity. An updated analysis by Esteva et al 69 yielded no major differences at 1 year with regard to progressive disease and the number of patients who experienced a reduction in left-ventricular ejection fraction. Trastuzumab-dttb (also known as SB3) was approved based on a phase 3 study by Pivot et al, 70-72 which randomized patients to receive either SB3 or trastuzumab-EU in 800 patients with operable HER2-positive breast cancer.…”
Section: Trastuzumab Biosimilar In Breast Cancer and Gastric Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trastuzumab-pkrb (also known as CT-P6) received approval based on a phase 3 study by Stebbing et al 68 , in 549 patients with operable HER2-positive breast cancer who received either CT-P6 or trastuzumab-US. 69 Patients received 4 cycles of CT-P6 or trastuzumab-US as neoadjuvant therapy in combination with docetaxel and another 4 cycles as adjuvant therapy in combination with FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide). Primary outcome of pathological CR and secondary outcome of ORR were found to be similar, as summarized in Table 1, with no clinically significant difference in toxicity.…”
Section: Trastuzumab Biosimilar In Breast Cancer and Gastric Cancermentioning
Objective: To summarize and review the clinical data of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biosimilars for use in treatment of cancer and the current challenges health care institutions face when implementing a newly approved biosimilar. Data Sources: A literature search of the following databases was performed between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019: PubMed, Google, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Search terms included the words biosimilar, bevacizumab, rituximab, and/or trastuzumab. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Only primary literature on biosimilars with an ongoing or completed phase 3 trial and/or FDA approval were included in the final analysis. Primary literature consisted of peer-reviewed publications, published abstracts, and any results posted on the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Data Synthesis: Clinical trials of FDA-approved biosimilars for bevacizumab, rituximab, and trastuzumab showed no significant differences with respect to efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics when compared with their reference products. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: The anticipated growth of biologics in oncology and the recent introduction of biosimilars over the past few years have placed a lot of emphasis on biosimilars as a significant source of cost savings for the health care system. Our article compiles and analyzes existing data on biosimilar efficacy, safety, and financial impact. Conclusions: The major concerns of biosimilars revolve around their long-term efficacy and safety. Even with many questions to be answered, biosimilars have the potential for significant cost savings in the US health care system.
“…Trastuzumab, the first recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody against HER2, has been widely used as one of the leading HER2-targeted agents. Recently, various trastuzumab biosimilars such as Herzuma (trastuzumab-pkrb) [ 16 , 17 ], Ogivri (trastuzumab-dkst) [ 18 ], Ontruzant (trastuzumab-dttb) [ 19 ], Trazimera (trastuzumab-qyyp) [ 20 ] and Kanjinti (trastuzumab-anns) [ 21 ] have been developed and approved. As these agents show efficacy and safety similar to trastuzumab, their use has become increasingly popular.…”
The prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is poor with the standard gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) regimen. Given that the rates of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity in BTC reaches around 15%, HER2-targeted therapy needs further investigation. This study aims to evaluate the preliminary efficacy/safety of first-line trastuzumab-pkrb plus GemCis in patients with advanced BTC. Patients with unresectable/metastatic HER2-positive BTC received trastuzumab-pkrb (on day 1 of each cycle, 8 mg/kg for the first cycle and 6 mg/kg for subsequent cycles), gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8) every 3 weeks. Of the 41 patients screened, 7 had HER2-positive tumours and 4 were enrolled. The median age was 72.5 years (one male). Primary tumour locations included extrahepatic (N = 2) and intrahepatic (N = 1) bile ducts, and gallbladder (N = 1). Best overall response was a partial response in two patients and stable disease in two patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.1 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The most common grade 3 adverse event was neutropenia (75%), but febrile neutropenia did not occur. No patient discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Trastuzumab-pkrb with GemCis showed promising preliminary feasibility in patients with HER2-positive advanced BTC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.