2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.639892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Treatment With Apatinib and Osimertinib After Osimertinib Resistance in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma—A Retrospective Analysis of a Multicenter Clinical Study

Abstract: Currently, there are limited treatment options for patients who developed resistance to osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor. Resistance to EGFR inhibitors is frequently associated with enhanced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels. This multicenter, retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the combination treatment with apatinib and osimertinib in 39 patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who developed osimertinib r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
7
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(27 reference statements)
3
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall adverse reactions of the combination regimen were acceptable and tolerable, which was consistent with the previous study regarding the combination therapy of antiangiogenic TKI plus osimertinib in EGFR‐positive NSCLC 25 . Interestingly, the incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs was 36.4%, which was higher than that of osimertinib monotherapy (grade ≥3 TRAEs was 23.0%) and lower than that of osimertinib plus bevacizumab (grade ≥3 TRAEs was ≥40%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall adverse reactions of the combination regimen were acceptable and tolerable, which was consistent with the previous study regarding the combination therapy of antiangiogenic TKI plus osimertinib in EGFR‐positive NSCLC 25 . Interestingly, the incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs was 36.4%, which was higher than that of osimertinib monotherapy (grade ≥3 TRAEs was 23.0%) and lower than that of osimertinib plus bevacizumab (grade ≥3 TRAEs was ≥40%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…least, our study preliminarily suggested that osimertinib plus anlotinib instead of antiangiogenic monoclonal antibody might be of valuable therapeutic significance for patients with EGFR T790Mpositive NSCLC. In addition, the results in present study were consistent with another exploratory retrospective study initiated by Yang and colleagues 25. They included a total of 39 patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC and investigated the efficacy and safety of combination administration with apatinib plus osimertinib after osimertinib resistance, which resulted in an ORR of 12.9% and median PFS of 4.0 months.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Patients from Group B all progressed after treatment with osimertinib, then combined with antiangiogenic agents, the median PFS was 9.2 months, which was comparable with the PFS results (10.1 months) of the AURA3 trial. 12 The ORR, DCR, and median PFS2 of combination therapy were 15.8%, 84.2%, and 5.0 months (95% CI: 4.5-5.5), respectively, which was also comparable with a retrospective study, 23 in which the efficacy of apatinib with osimertinib F I G U R E 4 A forest-graph of the association between different clinical characteristics and OS of all the enrolled patients in our cohort. OS, overall survival; EGFR-TKIs, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors after the progression of osimertinib in EGFR positive LUAD patients was explored, and the ORR, DCR, and median PFS of combination therapy were 12.8%, 79.5%, and 4 months, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Dual inhibition of VEGF and EGFR pathways had the potential advantage of reversing EGFR-TKI resistance ( Larsen et al, 2011 ). A retrospective analysis of patients with advanced NSCLC who failed osimertinib treatment showed that osimertinib rechallenge combined with apatinib reached a median PFS of 4 months (95% CI: 3.5–4.5 months) ( Yang et al, 2021 ). How about the combination of osimertinib and bevacizumab in osimertinib resistance?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%