2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4049618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of AYUSH-64 in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All systematic reviews identified specific tools for assessing risk of bias (RoB). Eleven studies 35,45,[46][47][48]55,[61][62][63]67,75 reported that studies had moderate to high reported RoB. Factors reported as contributing to high RoB included lack of information regarding blinding or randomization, problems with measurement of outcomes and selective reporting, selection bias, and small sample size.…”
Section: Systematic Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All systematic reviews identified specific tools for assessing risk of bias (RoB). Eleven studies 35,45,[46][47][48]55,[61][62][63]67,75 reported that studies had moderate to high reported RoB. Factors reported as contributing to high RoB included lack of information regarding blinding or randomization, problems with measurement of outcomes and selective reporting, selection bias, and small sample size.…”
Section: Systematic Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen reviews 37,39,42,43,46,47,51,52,54,58,60,65,68,70,73 indicated significant improvements in other laboratory measures, such as viral nucleic acid levels, inflammatory markers, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) negativity. Some studies 50,51,54,63,67,73 reported that there were no significant improvements in measures of viral clearance, 63 nucleic acid test, 50,51 or pro-inflammatory markers. 54,63…”
Section: Improvement In Imaging Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations