Efficacy and safety of automated epidermal micrograft in patients with stable segmental and nonsegmental vitiligo

Abstract

Vitiligo is a common, psychologically devastating pigmentary disorder. Surgical graftings are used to treat stable vitiligo when medical treatment fails. An automated epidermal micrograft harvesting (AEMH) system was first designated to treat wounds, and very few studies investigated the application of AEMH in vitiligo. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of the AEMH system in patients with stable segmental and nonsegmental vitiligo. The rate of repigmentation and adverse events was recorded bimonthly for at least 12 months. We analyzed the efficacy based on patient characteristics, vitiligo subtypes, and different anatomical locations. A total of 56 depigmented lesions from 34 patients were included. 95.50% of the automated epidermal micrografts were successfully grafted at the recipient sites. There was a significant improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) and Dermatologic Life Quality Index (DLQI) in patients treated with AEMH (p < 0.001). The rate of repigmentation by VASI score improves from 96.25 ± 8.59 to 48.30 ± 28.16 after the treatment (p < 0.001). Treatment outcomes were comparable between the patients of segmental and stable nonsegmental vitiligo. The face and neck region achieved a better outcome, followed by the trunk (chest, abdomen, back, and axilla), limbs, and the worse outcome was found in the acral region (p < 0.014). Conclusively, AEMH is an effective treatment procedure with limited adverse events in patients with stable vitiligo. This harvesting method may be a feasible option for vitiligo surgical treatment.

Meek micrografting, a novel surgical technique for the treatment of vitiligo and piebaldism: A case series

“…Another, comparable automated micrografting technique is the fractional epidermal micrografting technique, which is based on multiple suction blisters. 8,9 The main limitations of this study were the retrospective design and small sample size. Future studies are required to compare results with current transplantation techniques.…”